The tests were removed due to a nil pointer panic in
testCheckAzureRMVirtualMachineOSDiskVHDExistance when the storage account itself
had been deleted in the destroy stage
Added a test to cover opting out of VHD delete rather than polluting the basic
linux VM test.
```
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_deleteVHDOpt -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_deleteVHDOptOut
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_deleteVHDOptOut (731.54s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_deleteVHDOptIn
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_deleteVHDOptIn (590.87s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm 1322.529s
```
```
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_basicLinuxMachine -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_basicLinuxMachine
^[--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_basicLinuxMachine (587.63s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm 587.738s
```
* provider/azurerm: destroy azurerm_virtual_machine OS Disk VHD on deletion
The OS Disk previously wasn't deleted with the VM, this causes subsequent
apply operations which recreate the VM to fail as the VHD blob already exists.
Fixes#6610
* provider/azurerm: add delete_os_disk_on_termination to azurerm_virtual_machine
delete_os_disk_on_termination is a bool which defaults to false to avoid making
a breaking change, and to follow the same flow as the Azure API
Needed to change the test due to SQS having issues recreating the same
queue multiple times. Now it uses a random name
```
make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSSQSQueue_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSSQSQueue_
-timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSSQSQueue_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSQSQueue_importBasic (20.53s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSQSQueue_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSQSQueue_basic (33.85s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSQSQueue_redrivePolicy
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSQSQueue_redrivePolicy (26.59s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSQSQueue_Policybasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSQSQueue_Policybasic (36.92s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 117.908s
```
Soooo many missing fields not being set on the Read!
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/azurerm TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAzureRMNetworkSecurityRule_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
/Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/stringer
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/07/13 21:34:24 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v
-run=TestAccAzureRMNetworkSecurityRule_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMNetworkSecurityRule_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMNetworkSecurityRule_importBasic (208.10s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMNetworkSecurityRule_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMNetworkSecurityRule_basic (190.66s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMNetworkSecurityRule_addingRules
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMNetworkSecurityRule_addingRules (256.73s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm
655.514s
```
* Add scaleway provider
this PR allows the entire scaleway stack to be managed with terraform
example usage looks like this:
```
provider "scaleway" {
api_key = "snap"
organization = "snip"
}
resource "scaleway_ip" "base" {
server = "${scaleway_server.base.id}"
}
resource "scaleway_server" "base" {
name = "test"
# ubuntu 14.04
image = "aecaed73-51a5-4439-a127-6d8229847145"
type = "C2S"
}
resource "scaleway_volume" "test" {
name = "test"
size_in_gb = 20
type = "l_ssd"
}
resource "scaleway_volume_attachment" "test" {
server = "${scaleway_server.base.id}"
volume = "${scaleway_volume.test.id}"
}
resource "scaleway_security_group" "base" {
name = "public"
description = "public gateway"
}
resource "scaleway_security_group_rule" "http-ingress" {
security_group = "${scaleway_security_group.base.id}"
action = "accept"
direction = "inbound"
ip_range = "0.0.0.0/0"
protocol = "TCP"
port = 80
}
resource "scaleway_security_group_rule" "http-egress" {
security_group = "${scaleway_security_group.base.id}"
action = "accept"
direction = "outbound"
ip_range = "0.0.0.0/0"
protocol = "TCP"
port = 80
}
```
Note that volume attachments require the server to be stopped, which can lead to
downtimes of you attach new volumes to already used servers
* Update IP read to handle 404 gracefully
* Read back resource on update
* Ensure IP detachment works as expected
Sadly this is not part of the official scaleway api just yet
* Adjust detachIP helper
based on feedback from @QuentinPerez in
https://github.com/scaleway/scaleway-cli/pull/378
* Cleanup documentation
* Rename api_key to access_key
following @stack72 suggestion and rename the provider api_key for more clarity
* Make tests less chatty by using custom logger
We cannot use the "id" field to represent policy ID, because it is used
internally by Terraform. Also change the "id" field within a statement
to "sid" for consistency with the generated JSON.
This commit removes the ability to index into complex output types using
`terraform output a_list 1` (for example), and adds a `-json` flag to
the `terraform output` command, such that the output can be piped
through a post-processor such as jq or json. This removes the need to
allow arbitrary traversal of nested structures.
It also adds tests of human readable ("normal") output with nested lists
and maps, and of the new JSON output.
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/azurerm TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v
-run=TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_importBasic (137.98s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_basic (128.17s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm
266.169s
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/azurerm TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAzureRMSqlFirewallRule_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v
-run=TestAccAzureRMSqlFirewallRule_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMSqlFirewallRule_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMSqlFirewallRule_importBasic (146.88s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMSqlFirewallRule_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMSqlFirewallRule_basic (154.34s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm
301.231s
```
Also included the randomizing of the storage account and resource group
names
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/azurerm TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAzureRMStorageAccount_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v
-run=TestAccAzureRMStorageAccount_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMStorageAccount_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMStorageAccount_importBasic (141.66s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMStorageAccount_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMStorageAccount_basic (160.18s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm
301.852s
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/azurerm TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAzureRMDnsZone_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v
-run=TestAccAzureRMDnsZone_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMDnsZone_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMDnsZone_importBasic (88.68s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMDnsZone_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMDnsZone_basic (93.18s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm
181.874s
```
- Make sure attaching a disk or a NIC is tried a couple of times as this only works after the OS has fully booted;
- Stop using the device name instead of ID as the names differ depending on the hypervisor that you are using;
- VPC’s do not always have a source NAT IP;
Peter McAtominey