* vendor: update gopkg.in/ns1/ns1-go.v2
* provider/ns1: Port the ns1 provider to Terraform core
* docs/ns1: Document the ns1 provider
* ns1: rename remaining nsone -> ns1 (#10805)
* Ns1 provider (#11300)
* provider/ns1: Flesh out support for meta structs.
Following the structure outlined by @pashap.
Using reflection to reduce copy/paste.
Putting metas inside single-item lists. This is clunky, but I couldn't
figure out how else to have a nested struct. Maybe the Terraform people
know a better way?
Inside the meta struct, all fields are always written to the state; I
can't figure out how to omit fields that aren't used. This is not just
verbose, it actually causes issues because you can't have both "up" and
"up_feed" set).
Also some minor other changes:
- Add "terraform" import support to records and zones.
- Create helper class StringEnum.
* provider/ns1: Make fmt
* provider/ns1: Remove stubbed out RecordRead (used for testing metadata change).
* provider/ns1: Need to get interface that m contains from Ptr Value with Elem()
* provider/ns1: Use empty string to indicate no feed given.
* provider/ns1: Remove old record.regions fields.
* provider/ns1: Removes redundant testAccCheckRecordState
* provider/ns1: Moves account permissions logic to permissions.go
* provider/ns1: Adds tests for team resource.
* provider/ns1: Move remaining permissions logic to permissions.go
* ns1/provider: Adds datasource.config
* provider/ns1: Small clean up of datafeed resource tests
* provider/ns1: removes testAccCheckZoneState in favor of explicit name check
* provider/ns1: More renaming of nsone -> ns1
* provider/ns1: Comment out metadata for the moment.
* Ns1 provider (#11347)
* Fix the removal of empty containers from a flatmap
Removal of empty nested containers from a flatmap would sometimes fail a
sanity check when removed in the wrong order. This would only fail
sometimes due to map iteration. There was also an off-by-one error in
the prefix check which could match the incorrect keys.
* provider/ns1: Adds ns1 go client through govendor.
* provider/ns1: Removes unused debug line
* docs/ns1: Adds docs around apikey/datasource/datafeed/team/user/record.
* provider/ns1: Gets go vet green
* Importing the OpsGenie SDK
* Adding the goreq dependency
* Initial commit of the OpsGenie / User provider
* Refactoring to return a single client
* Adding an import test / fixing a copy/paste error
* Adding support for OpsGenie docs
* Scaffolding the user documentation for OpsGenie
* Adding a TODO
* Adding the User data source
* Documentation for OpsGenie
* Adding OpsGenie to the internal plugin list
* Adding support for Teams
* Documentation for OpsGenie Team's
* Validation for Teams
* Removing Description for now
* Optional fields for a User: Locale/Timezone
* Removing an implemented TODO
* Running makefmt
* Downloading about half the internet
Someone witty might simply sign this commit with "npm install"
* Adding validation to the user object
* Fixing the docs
* Adding a test creating multple users
* Prompting for the API Key if it's not specified
* Added a test for multiple users / requested changes
* Fixing the linting
* "external" provider for gluing in external logic
This provider will become a bit of glue to help people interface external
programs with Terraform without writing a full Terraform provider.
It will be nowhere near as capable as a first-class provider, but is
intended as a light-touch way to integrate some pre-existing or custom
system into Terraform.
* Unit test for the "resourceProvider" utility function
This small function determines the dependable name of a provider for
a given resource name and optional provider alias. It's simple but it's
a key part of how resource nodes get connected to provider nodes so
worth specifying the intended behavior in the form of a test.
* Allow a provider to export a resource with the provider's name
If a provider only implements one resource of each type (managed vs. data)
then it can be reasonable for the resource names to exactly match the
provider name, if the provider name is descriptive enough for the
purpose of the each resource to be obvious.
* provider/external: data source
A data source that executes a child process, expecting it to support a
particular gateway protocol, and exports its result. This can be used as
a straightforward way to retrieve data from sources that Terraform
doesn't natively support..
* website: documentation for the "external" provider
this once fixed aliasing issues related to the css transform: skew in
webkit browsers. a recent release causes it to render artifacts and bug
out. removing the declaration fixes it.
* Grafana provider
* grafana_data_source resource.
Allows data sources to be created in Grafana. Supports all data source
types that are accepted in the current version of Grafana, and will
support any future ones that fit into the existing structure.
* Vendoring of apparentlymart/go-grafana-api
This is in anticipation of adding a Grafana provider plugin.
* grafana_dashboard resource
* Website documentation for the Grafana provider.
This introduces the terraform state list command to list the resources
within a state. This is the first of many state management commands to
come into 0.7.
This is the first command of many to come that is considered a
"plumbing" command within Terraform (see "plumbing vs porcelain":
http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/what-are-plumbing-and-porcelain-td2190639.html).
As such, this PR also introduces a bunch of groundwork to support
plumbing commands.
The main changes:
- Main command output is changed to split "common" and "uncommon"
commands.
- mitchellh/cli is updated to support nested subcommands, since
terraform state list is a nested subcommand.
- terraform.StateFilter is introduced as a way in core to filter/search
the state files. This is very basic currently but I expect to make it
more advanced as time goes on.
- terraform state list command is introduced to list resources in a
state. This can take a series of arguments to filter this down.
Known issues, or things that aren't done in this PR on purpose:
- Unit tests for terraform state list are on the way. Unit tests for the
core changes are all there.
Here is an example that will setup the following:
+ An SSH key resource.
+ A virtual server resource that uses an existing SSH key.
+ A virtual server resource using an existing SSH key and a Terraform managed SSH key (created as "test_key_1" in the example below).
(create this as sl.tf and run terraform commands from this directory):
```hcl
provider "softlayer" {
username = ""
api_key = ""
}
resource "softlayer_ssh_key" "test_key_1" {
name = "test_key_1"
public_key = "${file(\"~/.ssh/id_rsa_test_key_1.pub\")}"
# Windows Example:
# public_key = "${file(\"C:\ssh\keys\path\id_rsa_test_key_1.pub\")}"
}
resource "softlayer_virtual_guest" "my_server_1" {
name = "my_server_1"
domain = "example.com"
ssh_keys = ["123456"]
image = "DEBIAN_7_64"
region = "ams01"
public_network_speed = 10
cpu = 1
ram = 1024
}
resource "softlayer_virtual_guest" "my_server_2" {
name = "my_server_2"
domain = "example.com"
ssh_keys = ["123456", "${softlayer_ssh_key.test_key_1.id}"]
image = "CENTOS_6_64"
region = "ams01"
public_network_speed = 10
cpu = 1
ram = 1024
}
```
You'll need to provide your SoftLayer username and API key,
so that Terraform can connect. If you don't want to put
credentials in your configuration file, you can leave them
out:
```
provider "softlayer" {}
```
...and instead set these environment variables:
- **SOFTLAYER_USERNAME**: Your SoftLayer username
- **SOFTLAYER_API_KEY**: Your API key
Kazumichi Yamamoto