Fixes#8455, #5390
This add a new `no_device` attribute to `ephemeral_block_device` block,
which allows users omit ephemeral devices from AMI's predefined block
device mappings, which is useful for EBS-only instance types.
* add rds db for opsworks
* switched to stack in vpc
* implement update method
* add docs
* implement and document force new resource behavior
* implement retry for update and delete
* add test that forces new resource
* Add new aws_vpc_endpoint_route_table_association resource.
This commit adds a new resource which allows to a list of route tables to be
either added and/or removed from an existing VPC Endpoint. This resource would
also be complimentary to the existing `aws_vpc_endpoint` resource where the
route tables might not be specified (not a requirement for a VPC Endpoint to
be created successfully) during creation, especially where the workflow is
such where the route tables are not immediately known.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczynski <krzysztof.wilczynski@linux.com>
Additions by Kit Ewbank <Kit_Ewbank@hotmail.com>:
* Add functionality
* Add documentation
* Add acceptance tests
* Set VPC endpoint route_table_ids attribute to "Computed"
* Changes after review - Set resource ID in create function.
* Changes after code review by @kwilczynski:
* Removed error types and simplified the error handling in 'resourceAwsVPCEndpointRouteTableAssociationRead'
* Simplified logging in 'resourceAwsVPCEndpointRouteTableAssociationDelete'
* provider/aws: Add DeploymentRollback as a valid TriggerEvent type
* provider/aws: Add auto_rollback_configuration to aws_codedeploy_deployment_group
* provider/aws: Document auto_rollback_configuration
- part of aws_codedeploy_deployment_group
* provider/aws: Support removing and disabling auto_rollback_configuration
- part of aws_codedeploy_deployment_group resource
- when removing configuration, ensure events are removed
- when disabling configuration, preserve events in case configuration is re-enabled
* provider/aws: Add alarm_configuration to aws_codedeploy_deployment_group
* provider/aws: Document alarm_configuration
- part of aws_codedeploy_deployment_group
* provider/aws: Support removing alarm_configuration
- part of aws_codedeploy_deployment_group resource
- disabling configuration doesn't appear to work...
* provider/aws: Refactor auto_rollback_configuration tests
- Add create test
- SKIP failing test for now
- Add tests for build & map functions
* provider/aws: Refactor new aws_code_deploy_deployment_group tests
- alarm_configuration and auto_rollback_configuration only
- add assertions to deployment_group basic test
- rename config funcs to be more easy to read
- group public tests together
* provider/aws: A max of 10 alarms can be added to a deployment group.
- aws_code_deploy_deployment_group.alarm_configuration.alarms
- verified this causes test failure with expected exception
* provider/aws: Test disabling alarm_configuration and auto_rollback_configuration
- the tests now pass after rebasing the latest master branch
The current example using the ELB's account ID will trigger an update for a resource that uses the `.id` instead if the `.arn` syntax.
Once updated to the `.arn`, no changes are detected.
[ci skip]
* provider/aws: Add ability to create aws_ebs_snapshot
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSEBSSnapshot_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/10 14:18:36 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSEBSSnapshot_
-timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSEBSSnapshot_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEBSSnapshot_basic (31.56s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSEBSSnapshot_withDescription
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEBSSnapshot_withDescription (189.35s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws220.928s
```
* docs/aws: Addition of the docs for aws_ebs_snapshot resource
* provider/aws: Creation of shared schema funcs for common AWS data source
patterns
* provider/aws: Create aws_ebs_snapshot datasource
Fixes#8828
This data source will use a number of filters, owner_ids, snapshot_ids
and restorable_by_user_ids in order to find the correct snapshot. The
data source has no real use case for most_recent and will error on no
snapshots found or greater than 1 snapshot found
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSEbsSnapshotDataSource_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/10 14:34:33 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSEbsSnapshotDataSource_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSEbsSnapshotDataSource_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEbsSnapshotDataSource_basic (192.66s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSEbsSnapshotDataSource_multipleFilters
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEbsSnapshotDataSource_multipleFilters (33.84s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws226.522s
```
* docs/aws: Addition of docs for the aws_ebs_snapshot data source
Adds the new resource `aws_ebs_snapshot`
* provider/aws: Add aws_alb data source
This adds the aws_alb data source for getting information on an AWS
Application Load Balancer.
The schema is nearly the same as the resource of the same name, with
most of the resource population logic de-coupled into its own function
so that they can be shared between the resource and data source.
* provider/aws: aws_alb data source language revisions
* Multiple/zero result error slightly updated to be a bit more
specific.
* Fixed relic of the copy of the resource docs (resource -> data
source)
When `force_destroy` was specifed on an `aws_iam_user` resource, only IAM
access keys and the login profile were destroyed. If a multi-factor auth
device had been activated for that user, deletion would fail as follows:
```
* aws_iam_user.testuser1: Error deleting IAM User testuser1: DeleteConflict: Cannot delete entity, must delete MFA device first.
status code: 409, request id: aa41b1b7-ac4d-11e6-bb3f-3b4c7a310c65
```
This commit iterates over any of the user's MFA devices and deactivates
them before deleting the user. It follows a pattern similar to that used
to remove users' IAM access keys before deletion.
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSUser_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/20 17:09:00 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSUser_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSUser_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSUser_importBasic (5.70s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSUser_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSUser_basic (11.12s)
PASS
ok github.com/rhenning/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 20.840s
```
The docs for the CreateDBInstance API call include quite a bit more information about each individual option, (for example `Engine` has each of the possible options listed, whilst the cli reference doesn't).
existing example returns an error like the following should you try to
run `terraform plan` against it:
Error reading config for aws_subnet[example]: data.aws_availability_zone.name_suffix: data variables must be four parts: data.TYPE.NAME.ATTR in:
${cidrsubnet(aws_vpc.example.cidr_block, 4, var.az_number[data.aws_availability_zone.name_suffix])}
* provider/aws: Add aws_alb_listener data source
This adds the aws_alb_listener data source to get information on an AWS
Application Load Balancer listener.
The schema is slightly modified (only option-wise, attributes are the
same) and we use the aws_alb_listener resource read function to get the
data.
Note that the HTTPS test here may fail due until
hashicorp/terraform#10180 is merged.
* provider/aws: Add aws_alb_listener data source docs
Now documented.
* Added key_name_prefix to aws_key_pair resource schema.
* Added logic to prefix the aws_key_pair name on create.
* Added aws_key_pair test config for key_name_prefix case.
* Copied test cases from testAccAWSSecurityGroup namespace.
* Modified copied test case to suit aws_key_pair resource.
* Changed required flag to optional on key_name argument for aws_key_pair resource.
* Added documentation for key_name_prefix argument.
* Code style fix.
* Fixed undefined variable error in test.
fixes#9110
An error was found where, static_routes_only was not set on a vpn
connection import. This commit introduces setting the static_routes_only
to false when no Options are found. This follows the AWS convention as follows:
```
- options (structure)
Indicates whether the VPN connection requires static routes. If you are creating a VPN connection for a device that does not support BGP, you must specify true .
Default: false
```
So we take it that `static_options_only` is false by default
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSVpnConnection_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/02 10:38:18 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSVpnConnection_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSVpnConnection_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSVpnConnection_importBasic (178.29s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSVpnConnection_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSVpnConnection_basic (336.81s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSVpnConnection_withoutStaticRoutes
--- PASS: TestAccAWSVpnConnection_withoutStaticRoutes (195.45s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 710.572s
```
The documentation mentions ownership of both VPCs for aws_vpc_peering_connection auto_accept to work but if both VPC are in separate accounts it does not matter if both account are owned or not.
In #6843 its stated that aws_vpc_peering_connection only works if both VPC are in the same AWS account.
The documentation fails to mention that peeing of two VPCs in two different regions is not supported by AWS.
Use this data source to get the ARN of a certificate in AWS Certificate
Manager (ACM). The process of requesting and verifying a certificate in ACM
requires some manual steps, which means that Terraform cannot automate the
creation of ACM certificates. But using this data source, you can reference
them by domain without having to hard code the ARNs as input.
The acceptance test included requires an ACM certificate be pre-created
in and information about it passed in via environment variables. It's a
bit sad but there's really no other way to do it.
* GH-8755 - Adding in support to attach ASG to ELB as independent action
* GH-8755 - Adding in docs
* GH-8755 - Adjusting attribute name and responding to other PR feedback
* provider/aws: Provide the option to skip_destroy on
aws_volume_attachment
When you want to attach and detach pre-existing EBS volumes to an
instance, we would do that as follows:
```
resource "aws_instance" "web" {
ami = "ami-21f78e11"
availability_zone = "us-west-2a"
instance_type = "t1.micro"
tags {
Name = "HelloWorld"
}
}
data "aws_ebs_volume" "ebs_volume" {
filter {
name = "size"
values = ["${aws_ebs_volume.example.size}"]
}
filter {
name = "availability-zone"
values = ["${aws_ebs_volume.example.availability_zone}"]
}
filter {
name = "tag:Name"
values = ["TestVolume"]
}
}
resource "aws_volume_attachment" "ebs_att" {
device_name = "/dev/sdh"
volume_id = "${data.aws_ebs_volume.ebs_volume.id}"
instance_id = "${aws_instance.web.id}"
skip_destroy = true
}
```
The issue here is that when we run a terraform destroy command, the volume tries to get detached from a running instance and goes into a non-responsive state. We would have to force_destroy the volume at that point and risk losing any data on it.
This PR introduces the idea of `skip_destroy` on a volume attachment. tl;dr:
We want the volume to be detached from the instane when the instance itself has been destroyed. This way the normal shut procedures will happen and protect the disk for attachment to another instance
Volume Attachment Tests:
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSVolumeAttachment_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/02 00:47:27 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSVolumeAttachment_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSVolumeAttachment_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSVolumeAttachment_basic (133.49s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSVolumeAttachment_skipDestroy
--- PASS: TestAccAWSVolumeAttachment_skipDestroy (119.64s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 253.158s
```
EBS Volume Tests:
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSEBSVolume_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/02 01:00:18 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSEBSVolume_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSEBSVolume_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEBSVolume_importBasic (26.38s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSEBSVolume_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEBSVolume_basic (26.86s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSEBSVolume_NoIops
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEBSVolume_NoIops (27.89s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSEBSVolume_withTags
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEBSVolume_withTags (26.88s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 108.032s
```
* Update volume_attachment.html.markdown
This will allows us to filter a specific ebs_volume for attachment to an
aws_instance
```
make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSEbsVolumeDataSource_'✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/01 12:39:19 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSEbsVolumeDataSource_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSEbsVolumeDataSource_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEbsVolumeDataSource_basic (28.74s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSEbsVolumeDataSource_multipleFilters
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEbsVolumeDataSource_multipleFilters (28.37s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws57.145s
```
When creating a CloudWatch Metric for an Application Load Balancer Target Group it is
neccessary to use the suffix of the ARN as the reference to the load
balancer TG . This commit exposes that as an attribute on the `aws_alb_target_group`
resource to prevent the need to use regular expression substitution to
make the reference.
Fixes#8679
The CallerReference attribute we passed to AWS in route53_health_checks
was `time.Now().Format(time.RFC3339Nano)`
When creating multiple resources with the Count meta-parameter, this was
causing issues as follows:
```
* aws_route53_health_check.healthstate.0: HealthCheckAlreadyExists: A different health check has already been created with the specified caller reference.
```
We have now exposed a new attribute called `reference_name` that can be set to pass multiple resources to the request
```
make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_' 130 ↵ ✹
==> Cecking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/10/31 10:41:07 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_importBasic (17.08s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_basic (28.17s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_withSearchString
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_withSearchString (28.07s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_withChildHealthChecks
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_withChildHealthChecks (20.71s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_IpConfig
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_IpConfig (16.09s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_CloudWatchAlarmCheck
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_CloudWatchAlarmCheck (22.42s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 132.568s
```
Clint