* helper/schema: Add custom Timeout block for resources
* refactor DefaultTimeout to suuport multiple types. Load meta in Refresh from Instance State
* update vpc but it probably wont last anyway
* refactor test into table test for more cases
* rename constant keys
* refactor configdecode
* remove VPC demo
* remove comments
* remove more comments
* refactor some
* rename timeKeys to timeoutKeys
* remove note
* documentation/resources: Document the Timeout block
* document timeouts
* have a test case that covers 'hours'
* restore a System default timeout of 20 minutes, instead of 0
* restore system default timeout of 20 minutes, refactor tests, add test method to handle system default
* rename timeout key constants
* test applying timeout to state
* refactor test
* Add resource Diff test
* clarify docs
* update to use constants
Starting with Go 1.8 betas, we've periodically received SIGQUITs on our
tests in Travis. The stack trace looks like this:
https://gist.github.com/mitchellh/abf09b0980f8ea01269f8d9d6133884d
The tests are timing out! This is a test that hasn't been touched really
in a very long time and has always passed. I've **reproduced this
locally** by setting `GOMAXPROCS=1` and running the test. By yielding
the scheduler in the hot loop, it now passes almost instantly every
time.
Perhaps the test can be written in a different way, but this gets tests
passing and I think will fix our periodic errors.
* provider/openstack: Redesign openstack_blockstorage_volume_attach_v2
The current design of openstack_blockstorage_volume_attach_v2 does
not correctly implement the Block Storage API attachment call. It
was only partially implemented, only marking volumes as being
attached, while never actually attaching them.
This redesign is a closer alignment to how creating attachments
to a standalone Block Storage service works.
For creating attachments specifically in the case of OpenStack
Compute instances, the openstack_compute_volume_attach_v2 resource
is required.
* provider/openstack: re-adding instance_id for backwards compatibility
This commit adds the openstack_compute_floatingip_associate_v2
resource which specifically handles associating a floating IP
address to an instance. This can be used instead of the existing
floating_ip options in the openstack_compute_instance_v2 resource.
* Replace DNSimple API client with the official Go client
* Upgrade DNSimple provider to use the new API v2
Acceptance tests pass:
```
=== RUN TestProvider
--- PASS: TestProvider (0.00s)
=== RUN TestProvider_impl
--- PASS: TestProvider_impl (0.00s)
=== RUN TestAccDNSimpleRecord_Basic
--- PASS: TestAccDNSimpleRecord_Basic (2.67s)
=== RUN TestAccDNSimpleRecord_Updated
--- PASS: TestAccDNSimpleRecord_Updated (1.88s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/dnsimple
```
Note that the code still has to be updated to pass the account ID
dynamically in place of "TODO-ACCOUNT".
* Refactor DNSimple provider to expose both client and config
The config is required as the new API wants to know the identifier of
the account you are operating to. The account is not stored in the
client (as the client can talk with different accounts), hence I need
to pass it as part of the config.
* Identify Terraform requests to DNSimple via UserAgent
* Upgrade to the latest dnsimple-go version
* Update docs
Provide upgrade instructions and update the docs for API v2.
* Remove rendundant type declaration
Fixes:#11750
Before this change, adding a log_subscription_filter and then deleting
it manually would yield this error on terraform plan/apply:
```
% terraform plan ✹ ✭
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_iam_role.iam_for_lambda: Refreshing state... (ID: test_lambdafuntion_iam_role_example123)
aws_cloudwatch_log_group.logs: Refreshing state... (ID: example_lambda_name)
aws_iam_role_policy.test_lambdafunction_iam_policy: Refreshing state... (ID: test_lambdafuntion_iam_role_example123:test_lambdafunction_iam_policy)
aws_lambda_function.test_lambdafunction: Refreshing state... (ID: example_lambda_name_example123)
aws_lambda_permission.allow_cloudwatch_logs: Refreshing state... (ID: AllowExecutionFromCloudWatchLogs)
aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter: Refreshing state... (ID: cwlsf-992677504)
Error refreshing state: 1 error(s) occurred:
* aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter: aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter: Subscription filter for log group example_lambda_name with name prefix test_lambdafunction_logfilter not found!
```
After this patch, we get the following behaviour:
```
% terraform plan ✹ ✭
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_iam_role.iam_for_lambda: Refreshing state... (ID: test_lambdafuntion_iam_role_example123)
aws_cloudwatch_log_group.logs: Refreshing state... (ID: example_lambda_name)
aws_lambda_function.test_lambdafunction: Refreshing state... (ID: example_lambda_name_example123)
aws_iam_role_policy.test_lambdafunction_iam_policy: Refreshing state... (ID: test_lambdafuntion_iam_role_example123:test_lambdafunction_iam_policy)
aws_lambda_permission.allow_cloudwatch_logs: Refreshing state... (ID: AllowExecutionFromCloudWatchLogs)
aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter: Refreshing state... (ID: cwlsf-992677504)
The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources
will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource
exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources
will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read.
Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when
"apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute.
+ aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter
destination_arn: "arn:aws:lambda:us-west-2:187416307283:function:example_lambda_name_example123"
filter_pattern: "logtype test"
log_group_name: "example_lambda_name"
name: "test_lambdafunction_logfilter"
role_arn: "<computed>"
Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy.
```
Mitchell Hashimoto