* Adding private gateway and static route resource to cloudstack provider
Testing the private gateway and static route resource requires a ROOT
account in Cloudstack
* changes requested by reviewer
Fixes#9654
Before the fix, I created an ASG with a schedule on it. Went to the AWS
console and deleted the schedule. A terraform plan looked as follows:
```
% terraform plan
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but
will not be persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_launch_configuration.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID:
terraform-test-foobar5)
aws_autoscaling_group.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID:
terraform-test-foobar5)
aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: foobar)
Error refreshing state: 1 error(s) occurred:
* aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar: Unable to find Autoscaling
* Scheduled Action: []*autoscaling.ScheduledUpdateGroupAction(nil)
```
After the fix:
```
terraform plan 1 ↵
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but
will not be persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_launch_configuration.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: terraform-test-foobar5)
aws_autoscaling_group.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: terraform-test-foobar5)
aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: foobar)
The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources
will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource
exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources
will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read.
Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when
"apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute.
+ aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar
arn: "<computed>"
autoscaling_group_name: "terraform-test-foobar5"
desired_capacity: "0"
end_time: "2018-01-16T13:00:00Z"
max_size: "0"
min_size: "0"
recurrence: "<computed>"
scheduled_action_name: "foobar"
start_time: "2018-01-16T07:00:00Z"
Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy.
```
Tests run as expected:
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSAutoscalingSchedule_' 2 ↵ ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/10/27 17:45:19 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSAutoscalingSchedule_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSAutoscalingSchedule_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSAutoscalingSchedule_basic (140.94s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSAutoscalingSchedule_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccAWSAutoscalingSchedule_disappears (179.17s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSAutoscalingSchedule_recurrence
--- PASS: TestAccAWSAutoscalingSchedule_recurrence (186.72s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSAutoscalingSchedule_zeroValues
--- PASS: TestAccAWSAutoscalingSchedule_zeroValues (167.73s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 674.530s
```
* provider/aws: data source for AWS Security Group
* provider/aws: add documentation for data source for AWS Security Group
* provider/aws: data source for AWS Security Group (improve if condition and syntax)
* fix fmt
* provider/scaleway: fix scaleway_volume_attachment with count > 1
since scaleway requires servers to be powered off to attach volumes to, we need
to make sure that we don't power down a server twice, or power up a server while
it's supposed to be modified.
sadly terraform doesn't seem to sport serialization primitives for usecases like
this, but putting the code in question behind a `sync.Mutex` does the trick, too
fixes#9417
* provider/scaleway: use mutexkv to lock per-resource
following @dcharbonnier suggestion. thanks!
* provider/scaleway: cleanup waitForServerState signature
* provider/scaleway: store serverID in var
* provider/scaleway: correct imports
* provider/scaleway: increase timeouts
* Improve messaging when storage account isn't found.
* Add client for finding resources when you don't know it's resource group.
* Add function to find Storage Account resource group name.
* Use the storage account resource group, not the virtual machine's resource group when deleting VHDs.
* Add description of storage account ID for clarity.
* Improve VHD deletion test when storage account is in different resource group.
* Use common function for ID parsing of storage account.
* Add AWS Prefix List data source.
AWS Prefix List data source acceptance test.
AWS Prefix List data source documentation.
* Improve error message when PL not matched.
* provider/scaleway speedup server deletion
using `terminate` instead of `poweroff` leads to a faster shutdown
fixes#9430
* provider/scaleway: extract server shutdown code
This test was previously passing but the limit appears to have been reduced
since.
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run TestAccAzureRMServiceBusTopic_enableParti -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMServiceBusTopic_enablePartitioning
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMServiceBusTopic_enablePartitioning (377.14s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm 377.235s
* Updated docker container documentation
Feedback from ticket #9350 indicated that documentation was out of date
renamed `hosts_entry` to `host`
added correct type information to *Extra Hosts* section.
Refs: 9350
* Fixes for docker_container host object
Feedback from ticket #9350 updated codebase so it reflects the requirements from docker in regards to `host` which is `Required` and not optional.
It now accurately reflects the docker requirements and the terraform documentation.
Test results
> Bear in mind the failure it is because my laptop doesnt support memory swap. So this test will always fail.
Changing the Schema from `optional` to `required` made no difference to the tests.
make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/docker/
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/10/14 15:04:40 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/docker/ -v -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccDockerRegistryImage_basic
--- PASS: TestAccDockerRegistryImage_basic (4.57s)
=== RUN TestAccDockerRegistryImage_private
--- PASS: TestAccDockerRegistryImage_private (6.22s)
=== RUN TestProvider
--- PASS: TestProvider (0.00s)
=== RUN TestProvider_impl
--- PASS: TestProvider_impl (0.00s)
=== RUN TestAccDockerContainer_basic
--- PASS: TestAccDockerContainer_basic (7.16s)
=== RUN TestAccDockerContainer_volume
--- PASS: TestAccDockerContainer_volume (7.37s)
=== RUN TestAccDockerContainer_customized
--- FAIL: TestAccDockerContainer_customized (18.99s)
testing.go:265: Step 0 error: Check failed: Check 2/2 error: Container has wrong memory swap setting: -1
Please check that you machine supports memory swap (you can do that by running 'docker info' command).
=== RUN TestAccDockerImage_basic
--- PASS: TestAccDockerImage_basic (2.58s)
=== RUN TestAccDockerImage_private
--- PASS: TestAccDockerImage_private (2.70s)
=== RUN TestAccDockerImage_destroy
--- PASS: TestAccDockerImage_destroy (30.00s)
=== RUN TestAccDockerImage_data
--- PASS: TestAccDockerImage_data (5.93s)
=== RUN TestAccDockerNetwork_basic
--- PASS: TestAccDockerNetwork_basic (0.24s)
=== RUN TestAccDockerVolume_basic
--- PASS: TestAccDockerVolume_basic (0.05s)
FAIL
exit status 1
FAIL github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/docker 85.816s
Makefile:47: recipe for target 'testacc' failed
make: *** [testacc] Error 1
Refs: 9350
* govendor: update go-cloudstack dependency
* Separate security groups and rules
This commit separates the creation and management of security groups and security group rules.
It extends the `icmp` options so you can supply `icmp_type` and `icmp_code` to enbale more specific configs.
And it adds lifecycle management of security group rules, so that security groups do not have to be recreated when rules are added or removed.
This is particulary helpful since the `cloudstack_instance` cannot update a security group without having to recreate the instance.
In CloudStack >= 4.9.0 it is possible to update security groups of existing instances, but as that is just added to the latest version it seems a bit too soon to start using this (causing backwards incompatibility issues for people or service providers running older versions).
* Add and update documentation
* Add acceptance tests
When passing a bool type to a variable such as `-var foo=true`, the CLI
would parse this as a `bool` type which Terraform core cannot handle.
It would then error with an invalid type error.
This changes the handling to convert the bool to its literally string
value given on the command-line.
Paul Stack