* aws_db_parameter_group: Support more than 20 parameters in a single update
* create test to prove greater than 20 database parameters can be processed
* update test to prove updating greater than 20 database parameters can be processed
* Issues with certain key value database parameters
Cannot create a passing test for database parameters "innodb_file_per_table" and "binlog_format"
It seems that these parameters can be created and tested successfully
BUT after the "parameter group" has been destroyed, it then makes a "DescribeDBParameterGroups" call
This fails with a 404 error...makes sense since the group does not exist
Have very little understanding of how the test framework works, so am struggling to debug
Currently commented out to have a passing test
* reorder create database parameter group dataset
* reorder update database parameter group dataset
* typo: excede => exceed
* add one extra database parameter; now it is 41 in total
* added test for additonal database parameter added in previous commit
* remove commented out database parameters from test
* provider/scaleway: update api version
* provider/scaleway: expose ipv6 support, rename ip attributes
since it can be both ipv4 and ipv6, choose a more generic name.
* provider/scaleway: allow servers in different SGs
* provider/scaleway: update documentation
* provider/scaleway: Update docs with security group
* provider/scaleway: add testcase for server security groups
* provider/scaleway: make deleting of security rules more resilient
* provider/scaleway: make deletion of security group more resilient
* provider/scaleway: guard against missing server
* provider/aws: Delete access keys before deleting IAM user
* provider/aws: Put IAM key removal behind force_destroy option
* provider/aws: Move all access key deletion under force_destroy
* Add iam_user force_destroy to website
* provider/aws: Improve clarity of looping over pages in delete IAM user
Sidebar:
- Rename "Azure (Resource Manager)" to "Microsoft Azure" and sort
accordingly
- Rename "Azure (Service Management)" to "Microsoft Azure (Legacy ASM)"
and sort accordingly
ARM provider docs:
- Name changes everywhere to Microsoft Azure Provider
- Mention and link to "legacy Azure Service Management Provider" in opening paragraph
- Sidebar gains link at bottom to Azure Service Management Provider
ASM provider docs:
- Name changes everywhere to Azure Service Management Provider
- Sidebar gains link at bottom to Microsoft Azure Provider
- Every page gets a header with the following
- "NOTE: The Azure Service Management provider is no longer being actively developed by HashiCorp employees. It continues to be supported by the community. We recommend using the Azure Resource Manager based [Microsoft Azure Provider] instead if possible."
We conditionally format version with VersionPrerelease in a number of
places. Add a package-level function where we can unify the version
format. Replace most of version formatting in terraform, but leave th
few instances set from the top-level package to make sure we don't break
anything before release.
`aws_rds_cluster_instance`
The Import test showed that there was no setting of the
`storage_encrypted` value back to state on the Read func.
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSRDSClusterInstance_importBasic'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSRDSClusterInstance_importBasic -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSRDSClusterInstance_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRDSClusterInstance_importBasic (754.30s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 754.411s
```
The same instance of the resources’ `schema.Resource` is used for all resources of the same type.
So we need to set either `true` or `false` for every resource to make sure we get the correct value.
* add opsworks permission resource
* add docs
* remove permission from state if the permission object could not be found
* remove nil validate function. validation is done in schema.Resource.
* add id to the list of exported values
* renge over permission to check that we have found got the correct one
* removed comment
* removed set id
* fix unknown region us-east-1c
* add user_profile resource
* add docs
* add default value
* provider/aws: Support kms_key_id for `aws_rds_cluster`
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSRDSCluster_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSRDSCluster_
-timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSRDSCluster_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRDSCluster_basic (127.57s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRDSCluster_kmsKey
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRDSCluster_kmsKey (323.72s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRDSCluster_encrypted
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRDSCluster_encrypted (173.25s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRDSCluster_backupsUpdate
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRDSCluster_backupsUpdate (264.07s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 888.638s
```
* provider/aws: Add KMS Key ID to `aws_rds_cluster_instance`
```
```
Rearrange client setup, and remove the extraneous log lines we make per
connection. There's no need to log one line per API client - we're just
setting up structs for most of them.
Since this collapses the file down quite a bit, switch to alphabetized
client setup, since previously there wasn't much of an order to things.
Partha Dutta