An `InstanceDiff` will include `ResourceAttrDiff` entries for the
"length" / `#` field of maps. This makes sense, since for something like
`terraform plan` it's useful to see when counts are changing.
The `DiffFieldReader` was not taking these entries into account when
reading maps out, and was therefore incorrectly returning maps that
included an extra `'#'` field, which was causing all sorts of havoc
for providers (extra tags on AWS instances, broken google compute
instance launch, possibly others).
* fixes#914 - extra tags on AWS instances
* fixes#883 - general core issue sprouted from #757
* removes the hack+TODO from #757
This resource allows an existing Route Table to be assigned as the
"main" Route Table of a VPC. This means that the Route Table will be
used for any subnets within the VPC without an explicit Route Table
assigned [1].
This is particularly useful in getting an Internet Gateway in place as
the default for a VPC, since the automatically created Main Route Table
does not have one [2].
Note that this resource is an abstraction over an association and does not
map directly to a CRUD-able object in AWS. In order to retain a coherent
"Delete" operation for this resource, we remember the ID of the AWS-created
Route Table and reset the VPC's main Route Table to it when this
resource is deleted.
refs #843, #748
[1] http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonVPC/latest/UserGuide/VPC_Route_Tables.html#RouteTableDetails
[2] http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonVPC/latest/UserGuide/VPC_Internet_Gateway.html#Add_IGW_Routing
If map_public_ip_on_launch was not specified, AWS picks a default of
"0", which is different than the "" in the state file, triggerinng an
update each time. Mark that parameter as Computed, avoiding the update.
with this commit, the google compute instance acceptance tests are
passing
- remove GOOGLE_CLIENT_FILE requirement from provider tests to finish
out #452
- skip extra "#" key that shows up in metadata maps, fixes#757 and
sprouts #883 to figure out core issue
- more verbose variablenames in metadata parsing, since it took me
awhile to grok and i thought there might have been a shadowing bug in
there for a minute. maybe someday when i'm a golang master i'll be
smart enough to be comfortable with one-char varnames. :)
Paul Hinze