Regressions were introduced when fixing
https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/pull/8607 . Specifically when
resources in the statefile are deleted or missing in real life, then
terraform plan would exit with an error when it recieved a 404 not
found. The correct behaviour would be to show a plan with the offer to
create the missing resources.
If a resource ID has more than one subscriptions key, as is the case for Service
Bus subscriptions the Azure SubscriptionID field was overwritten by the second
value.
TF_ACC= go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -run TestParseAzureResourceID -timeout=30s -parallel=4
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm 0.060s
This changes the key for the storage to be the _raw_ source from the
module, not the fully expanded source. Example: it'll be a relative path
instead of an absolute path.
This allows the ".terraform/modules" directory to be portable when
moving to other machines. This was a behavior that existed in <= 0.7.2
and was broken with #8398. This amends that and adds a test to verify.
Fixes#9108
When an aws_route53_record alias is created with terraform and then
modified via cli or console, terraform wasn't picking up the changes. I
had the following config:
```
resource "aws_route53_record" "alias" {
zone_id = "${aws_route53_zone.main.zone_id}"
name = "www"
type = "A"
alias {
zone_id = "${aws_elb.main.zone_id}"
name = "${aws_elb.main.dns_name}"
evaluate_target_health = true
}
}
```
I changed the evaluate_health_target on the AWS console and terraform plan showed me this:
```
% terraform plan
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but
will not be persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_route53_zone.main: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X)
aws_elb.main: Refreshing state... (ID: foobar-terraform-elb-1111)
aws_route53_record.alias: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X_www_A)
No changes. Infrastructure is up-to-date. This means that Terraform
could not detect any differences between your configuration and
the real physical resources that exist. As a result, Terraform
doesn't need to do anything.
```
When rebuilding the provider with the changes in the PR, a terraform plan then looks as follows:
```
% terraform plan
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-azurerm overrides an internal plugin for azurerm-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but
will not be persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_route53_zone.main: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X)
aws_elb.main: Refreshing state... (ID: foobar-terraform-elb-1111)
aws_route53_record.alias: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X_www_A)
The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources
will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource
exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources
will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read.
Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when
"apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute.
~ aws_route53_record.alias
alias.1050468691.evaluate_target_health: "" => "true"
alias.1050468691.name: "" => "foobar-terraform-elb-1111-522021794.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com"
alias.1050468691.zone_id: "" => "Z1H1FL5HABSF5"
alias.2906616344.evaluate_target_health: "false" => "false"
alias.2906616344.name: "foobar-terraform-elb-1111-522021794.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com." => ""
alias.2906616344.zone_id: "Z1H1FL5HABSF5" => ""
Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.
```
the apply then changed the target back to true
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSRoute53Record_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/09/29 18:17:23 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSRoute53Record_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic (120.63s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic_fqdn
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic_fqdn (131.81s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_txtSupport
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_txtSupport (128.40s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_spfSupport
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_spfSupport (120.06s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_generatesSuffix
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_generatesSuffix (114.02s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_wildcard
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_wildcard (165.54s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_failover
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_failover (118.10s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_basic (128.10s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_alias (132.62s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_s3_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_s3_alias (132.12s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_alias (237.92s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_geolocation_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_geolocation_basic (121.95s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_latency_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_latency_basic (123.40s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_TypeChange
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_TypeChange (198.24s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_empty
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_empty (119.68s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws2092.597s
```
Andreas Kyrris