```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSSESReceiptFilter_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSSESReceiptFilter_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSSESReceiptFilter_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSESReceiptFilter_importBasic (18.18s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSESReceiptFilter_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSESReceiptFilter_basic (18.42s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 36.633s
```
```
make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSSESReceiptRuleSet_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSSESReceiptRuleSet_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSSESReceiptRuleSet_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSESReceiptRuleSet_importBasic (18.60s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSESReceiptRuleSet_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSESReceiptRuleSet_basic (26.92s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 45.550s
```
JUst needed some rejigging of the skip_final_snapshot work as that isn't
returned by the API and skipping it means the destroy fails due to
missing final_snapshot_identifier
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws
% TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSDBInstance_' ✹ ✭
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
/Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/stringer
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /vendor/)
2016/07/07 15:28:31 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSDBInstance_
-timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSDBInstance_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBInstance_importBasic (588.70s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSDBInstance_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBInstance_basic (595.71s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSDBInstance_kmsKey
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBInstance_kmsKey (726.46s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSDBInstance_optionGroup
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBInstance_optionGroup (681.78s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSDBInstance_iops_update
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBInstance_iops_update
(590.81s)
```
Please note that I cannot run the enhanced monitoring test in my
environment as I have already got it attached to an IAM role. Running
that test gives me this result:
```
```
When adding multiple notifications from one S3 bucket to one SQS queue, it wasn't immediately intuitive how to do this.
At first I created two `aws_s3_bucket_notification` configs and it seemed to work fine, however the config for one event
will overwrite the other. In order to have multiple events, you can defined the `queue` key twice, or use an array if you're
working with the JSON syntax. I tried to make this more clear in the documentation.
* Fix nested module "unknown variable" during dstry
During a destroy with nested modules, accessing a variable between them
causes an "unknown variable accessed" during destroy.
Passing a literal map to a module looks like this in HCL:
module "foo" {
source = "./foo"
somemap {
somekey = "somevalue"
}
}
The HCL parser always wraps an extra list around the map, so we need to
remove that extra list wrapper when the parameter is indeed of type "map".
Fixes#7140
In scenarios with a lot of small configs, it's tedious to fan out actual
dir trees in a test-fixtures dir. It also spreads out the context of the
test - requiring the reader fetch a bunch of scattered 3 line files in
order to understand what is being tested.
Our config loading code still only reads from disk, but in
the `helper/resource` acc test framework we work around this by writing
inline config to temp files and loading it from there. This helper is
based on that strategy.
Eventually it'd be great to be able to build up a `module.Tree` from
config directly, but this gets us the functionality today.
Example Usage:
testModuleInline(t, map[string]string{
"top.tf": `
module "middle" {
source = "./middle"
}
`,
"middle/mid.tf": `
module "bottom" {
source = "./bottom"
amap {
foo = "bar"
}
}
`,
"middle/bottom/bot.tf": `
variable "amap" {
type = "map"
}
`,
}),
The symptom is that a route "fails" to create, then every subsequent
`terraform apply` fails with RouteAlreadyExists.
CreateRoute was succeeding but the very next DescribeRouteTables
was not listing the new route.
This fixes#7157. It doesn't change the way aws_ami works
```
make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws
TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSAMICopy'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSAMICopy
-timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSAMICopy
--- PASS: TestAccAWSAMICopy (479.75s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 479.769s
```
Fixes#7433
When an EFS File System is created via Terraform, Deleted from the AWS
console, then Terraform would give us as error as:
```
* aws_efs_file_system.file_system: FileSystemNotFound: File system
'fs-9d739e54' does not exist.
status code: 404, request id:
d505a682-3ec7-11e6-81d3-1d41202f0881
```
On a 404, we now remove the EFS File System from state so that Terraform
can recreate it as expected
Guarding against `invalid memory address` in AdditionalUnattendConfig
```
make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/azurerm TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_windowsUnattendedConfig'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v
-run=TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_windowsUnattendedConfig -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_windowsUnattendedConfig
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_windowsUnattendedConfig (943.28s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm
943.299s
```
allows load balancer policies and their assignment to backend servers or listeners to be configured independently.
this gives flexibility to configure additional policies on aws elastic load balancers aside from the already provided "convenience" wrappers for cookie stickiness
This resource (unlike the others in this provider) isn't stateful, so it
is a good candidate to be a data source.
The old resource form is preserved via the standard shim in helper/schema,
which will generate a deprecation warning but will still allow the
resource to be used.
Clint