When working with a ConfigResource, the generalization of a
ModuleInstance to a Module was inadvertently dropped, and there was to
test coverage for that type of target.
Ensure we can target a specific module instance alone.
Before expansion happens, we only have expansion resource nodes that
know their ConfigResource address. In order to properly compare these to
targets within a module instance, we need to generalize the target to
also be a ConfigResource.
We can also remove the IgnoreIndices field from the transformer, since
we have addresses that are properly scoped and can compare them in the
correct context.
When moving a resource block with multiple instances to a new address
within the same module, we need to ensure that the target module is
present as late as possible. Otherwise, deleting the resource from the
original address triggers pruning, and the module is removed just before
we try to add the resource to it, which causes a crash.
Includes regression test which panics without this code change.
* upgrade go-cidr to v1.1.0
* lang/funcs: refactor Subnet and Host functions to support 64-bit systems
* add test cases and remove no-longer-needed validation
If a statefile had resources with the same name in different modules,
the sort order could be inconsistent between state refreshes. This adds
the module to the Less() function used in sorting and a minimal test to
verify consistent ordering.
Most of the state package has been deprecated by the states package.
This PR replaces all the references to the old state package that
can be done simply - the low-hanging fruit.
* states: move state.Locker to statemgr
The state.Locker interface was a wrapper around a statemgr.Full, so
moving this was relatively straightforward.
* command: remove unnecessary use of state package for writing local terraform state files
* move state.LocalState into terraform package
state.LocalState is responsible for managing terraform.States, so it
made sense (to me) to move it into the terraform package.
* slight change of heart: move state.LocalState into clistate instead of
terraform
* unlock the state if Context() has an error, exactly as backend/remote does today
* terraform console and terraform import will exit before unlocking state in case of error in Context()
* responsibility for unlocking state in the local backend is pushed down the stack, out of backend.go and into each individual state operation
* add tests confirming that state is not locked after apply and plan
* backend/local: add checks that the state is unlocked after operations
This adds tests to plan, apply and refresh which validate that the state
is unlocked after all operations, regardless of exit status. I've also
added specific tests that force Context() to fail during each operation
to verify that locking behavior specifically.
- Edits to registry overview
- Add index link as 'overview' (header links are semi-invisible)
- move providers/overview.html to providers/index.html
- Edits to providers overview
- fix filename of os-arch
- edits to provider publishing
The validate command should work with the configuration, but when
validate was run at the start of a plan or apply command the state was
inserted in preparation for the next walk. This could lead to errors
when the resource schemas had changes and the state could not be
upgraded or decoded.
* updating `github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go` to `v45.0.0`
* updating `github.com/Azure/go-autorest` to `v0.11.3`
* updating `github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-helpers` to `v0.12.0`
* updating `github.com/tombuildsstuff/giovanni` to `v0.12.0`
While removal of attributes can be handled by providers through the
UpgradeResourceState call, data sources may need to be evaluated before
reading, and they have no upgrade path in the provider protocol.
Strip out extra attributes during state decoding when they are no longer
present in the schema, and there is no schema upgrade pending.
Terraform's design assumes that each remote object in Terraform's care is
bound to one resource instance and one alone. If the same object is bound
to multiple instances then confusing behavior will often result, such as
two resource configurations competing to update a single object, or
objects being "left behind" when all existing Terraform deployments are
destroyed.
This assumption was previously only implied, though. This change is an
attempt to be more explicit about it, although these are additions to some
older documentation sections that have not been revised for some time and
so this is just a best effort to make this information discoverable
without getting drawn into a full-on reorganization of these sections.
While revising this there were some particular oddities that I decided to
revise while I was there, but I'll leave a fuller revision of this older
content for a later commit when we have more time to review it in greater
detail.
James Bardin