Fix an issue when trying to get a public IPv4 address and a public IPv6
address that results in the following error:
Error launching source instance: InvalidParameterCombination:
Network interfaces and an instance-level IPv6 address count may not
be specified on the same request
To fix, in situations where we want a IPv6 addresses AND we need to
manually specify network interfaces on the instance, create the IPv6
addresses on the network interface that we're creating rather than on
the instance itself.
Fixes#13250
Fixes: #14032
When you are using an IPv6 address directly to an instance, it was
causing the ipv6_address_count to try and ForceNew resource. It wasn't
marked as computed
I was able to see this here:
```
-/+ aws_instance.test
ami: "ami-c5eabbf5" => "ami-c5eabbf5"
associate_public_ip_address: "false" => "<computed>"
availability_zone: "us-west-2a" => "<computed>"
ebs_block_device.#: "0" => "<computed>"
ephemeral_block_device.#: "0" => "<computed>"
instance_state: "running" => "<computed>"
instance_type: "t2.micro" => "t2.micro"
ipv6_address_count: "1" => "0" (forces new resource)
ipv6_addresses.#: "1" => "1"
ipv6_addresses.0: "2600:1f14:bb2:e501::10" => "2600:1f14:bb2:e501::10"
key_name: "" => "<computed>"
network_interface.#: "0" => "<computed>"
network_interface_id: "eni-d19115ec" => "<computed>"
placement_group: "" => "<computed>"
primary_network_interface_id: "eni-d19115ec" => "<computed>"
private_dns: "ip-10-20-1-252.us-west-2.compute.internal" => "<computed>"
private_ip: "10.20.1.252" => "<computed>"
public_dns: "" => "<computed>"
public_ip: "" => "<computed>"
root_block_device.#: "1" => "<computed>"
security_groups.#: "0" => "<computed>"
source_dest_check: "true" => "true"
subnet_id: "subnet-3fdfb476" => "subnet-3fdfb476"
tags.%: "1" => "1"
tags.Name: "stack72" => "stack72"
tenancy: "default" => "<computed>"
volume_tags.%: "0" => "<computed>"
vpc_security_group_ids.#: "1" => "<computed>"
```
It now works as expected:
```
% terraform plan ✹ ✭
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_vpc.foo: Refreshing state... (ID: vpc-fa61669d)
aws_subnet.foo: Refreshing state... (ID: subnet-3fdfb476)
aws_internet_gateway.foo: Refreshing state... (ID: igw-70629a17)
aws_route_table.test: Refreshing state... (ID: rtb-0a52e16c)
aws_instance.test: Refreshing state... (ID: i-0971755345296aca5)
aws_route_table_association.a: Refreshing state... (ID: rtbassoc-b12493c8)
No changes. Infrastructure is up-to-date.
This means that Terraform did not detect any differences between your
configuration and real physical resources that exist. As a result, Terraform
doesn't need to do anything.
```
With an EC2 instance that only had a single network interface, the primary interface, the Update function would call `ModifyInstanceAttribute()` on the target instance. This would only work if there was a single network interface attached to the EC2 instance. If, however, a secondary network interface was attached to the instance, the `ModifyInstanceAttribute()` API call would fail with the following error message:
> There are multiple interfaces attached to instance 'i-XXXXX'. Please specify an interface ID for the operation instead.
After this changeset, modifying instance security groups now makes the correct call to `ModifyNetworkInterfaceAttribute()` in order to modify the list of security groups on the primary network interface, as initially configured during the instances creation.
This change is also safe from an instance that has a non-default primary network interface, as the instance attribute `vpc_security_group_ids` conflicts with the new `network_interface` attribute.
Test Output:
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS="-run=TestAccAWSInstance_addSecurityGroupNetworkInterface"
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/05/08 17:52:42 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSInstance_addSecurityGroupNetworkInterface -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSInstance_addSecurityGroupNetworkInterface
--- PASS: TestAccAWSInstance_addSecurityGroupNetworkInterface (327.75s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 327.756s
```
The default value for `source_dest_check` needs to remain the same, so as not to break any backwards compatibility, however, adding a new `network_interface` parameter with a pre-configured network_interface that has `source_dest_check` set to false throws a diff after initial apply. Since we don't want to change `source_dest_check` to computed in order to not break sane defaults, ignore the diff thrown if `network_interface` attributes are configured on an instance.
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS="-run=TestAccAWSInstance_primaryNetworkInterfaceSourceDestCheck"
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/04/28 16:26:02 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSInstance_primaryNetworkInterfaceSourceDestCheck -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSInstance_primaryNetworkInterfaceSourceDestCheck
--- PASS: TestAccAWSInstance_primaryNetworkInterfaceSourceDestCheck (134.20s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 134.211s
```
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS="-run=TestAccAWSInstance_sourceDestCheck"
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/04/28 16:15:14 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSInstance_sourceDestCheck -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSInstance_sourceDestCheck
--- PASS: TestAccAWSInstance_sourceDestCheck (179.81s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 179.815s
```
Fixes: #14068
Fixes: #14003
When an EBS volume was created and tags were specified on that resource
and NOT the aws_instance it was attached to, the tags would be removed
on subsequent Terraform runs.
We need to set volume_tags to be Computed to allow for changes to EBS
volumes not created as part of the instance but that are attached to the
instance
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSInstance_volumeTagsComputed'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/04/27 07:33:36 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSInstance_volumeTagsComputed -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSInstance_volumeTagsComputed
--- PASS: TestAccAWSInstance_volumeTagsComputed (151.37s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 151.411s
```
Fixes: #13173
We now tag at instance creation and introduced `volume_tags` that can be
set so that all devices created on instance creation will receive those
tags
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSInstance_volumeTags' 2 ↵ ✚ ✭
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/04/26 06:30:48 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSInstance_volumeTags -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSInstance_volumeTags
--- PASS: TestAccAWSInstance_volumeTags (214.31s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 214.332s
```
machines
Fixes: #12898
The way aws_instance works is that we call the Create func then the
Update func then the Read func. The way the work to implement the change
to iam_instance_profile was added meant that when a machine was created
with an iam_instance_profile, it would then try and update that
iam_instance_profile because the state hadn't been updated at that point
We have changed the Update func to only check for the change to
iam_instance_profile when it *is an existing machine* - this will solve
the problem of those bringing up new machines and getting hit with the
permissions error
As requested, added a test that adds an IAM Instance Profile from
creation
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSInstance_withIamInstanceProfile'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/21 17:51:32 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSInstance_withIamInstanceProfile -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSInstance_withIamInstanceProfile
--- PASS: TestAccAWSInstance_withIamInstanceProfile (154.29s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 154.325s
```
Fixes#8455, #5390
This add a new `no_device` attribute to `ephemeral_block_device` block,
which allows users omit ephemeral devices from AMI's predefined block
device mappings, which is useful for EBS-only instance types.
Make sure to hash base64 decoded value since user_data might be given
either raw bytes or base64 value.
This helps https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/1887 somewhat
as now you can:
1) Update user_data in AWS console.
2) Respectively update user_data in terraform code.
3) Just refresh terraform state and it should not report any changes.
* Don't Base64-encode EC2 userdata if it is already Base64 encoded
The user data may be Base64 encoded already - for example, if it has been
generated by a template_cloudinit_config resource.
* Add encoded user_data to aws_instance acceptance test
We changed the way validation works for providers so that they aren't
always configured if they have computed attributes. The result is that
sometimes the Configure won't be called, hence Meta is nil
Some AMIs have a RootDeviceName like "/dev/sda1" that does not appear as a
DeviceName in the BlockDeviceMapping list (which will instead have
something like "/dev/sda")
While this seems like it breaks an invariant of AMIs, it ends up working
on the AWS side, and AMIs like this are common enough that we need to
special case it so Terraform does the right thing.
Our heuristic is: if the RootDeviceName does not appear in the
BlockDeviceMapping, assume that the DeviceName of the first
BlockDeviceMapping entry serves as the root device.
fixes#2224
This landed in aws-sdk-go yesterday, breaking the AWS provider in many places:
3c259c9586
Here, with much sedding, grepping, and manual massaging, we attempt to
catch Terraform up to the new `awserr.Error` interface world.
Depends on there being an existing placement group in the account called
"terraform-placement-group" - we'll need to circle back around to cover
this with AccTests after TF gets an `aws_placement_group` resource.
Currently, we weren't correctly setting the ids, and are setting both
`security_groups` and `vpc_security_group_ids`. As a result, we really only use
the former.
We also don't actually update the latter in the `update` method.
This PR fixes both issues, correctly reading `security_groups` vs.
`vpc_security_group_ids` and allows users to update the latter without
destroying the Instance when in a VPC.
Adds an "alias" field to the provider which allows creating multiple instances
of a provider under different names. This provides support for configurations
such as multiple AWS providers for different regions. In each resource, the
provider can be set with the "provider" field.
(thanks to Cisco Cloud for their support)
Jake Champlin