* provider/datadog #9375: Refactor tags to a list instead of a map.
Tags are allowed to be but not restricted to, key value pairs (ie: foo:bar)
but are esssentially strings. This changes allows using, and mixing of tags with
form "foo" and "foo:bar". It also allows using duplicate keys like "foo:bar" and "foo:baz".
* provider/datadog update import test.
* Re-factor the Vagrantfile.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczynski <krzysztof.wilczynski@linux.com>
* Change to `--force` and `--force-yes` to `--assume-yes`.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczynski <krzysztof.wilczynski@linux.com>
This commit extracts the GPG code used for aws_iam_user_login_profile
into a library that can be reused for other resources, and updates the
call sites appropriately.
* provider/azurerm: Bump sdk version to 7.0.1
* Fixing the build (#10489)
* Fixing the broken tests (#10499)
* Updating the method signatures to match (#10533)
Fixes#10463
I'm really surprised this flew under the radar for years...
By having unique PRNGs, the SSH communicator could and would
generate identical ScriptPaths and two provisioners running in parallel
could overwrite each other and execute the same script. This would
happen because they're both seeded by the current time which could
potentially be identical if done in parallel...
Instead, we share the rand now so that the sequence is guaranteed
unique. As an extra measure of robustness, we also multiple by the PID
so that we're also protected against two processes at the same time.
* "external" provider for gluing in external logic
This provider will become a bit of glue to help people interface external
programs with Terraform without writing a full Terraform provider.
It will be nowhere near as capable as a first-class provider, but is
intended as a light-touch way to integrate some pre-existing or custom
system into Terraform.
* Unit test for the "resourceProvider" utility function
This small function determines the dependable name of a provider for
a given resource name and optional provider alias. It's simple but it's
a key part of how resource nodes get connected to provider nodes so
worth specifying the intended behavior in the form of a test.
* Allow a provider to export a resource with the provider's name
If a provider only implements one resource of each type (managed vs. data)
then it can be reasonable for the resource names to exactly match the
provider name, if the provider name is descriptive enough for the
purpose of the each resource to be obvious.
* provider/external: data source
A data source that executes a child process, expecting it to support a
particular gateway protocol, and exports its result. This can be used as
a straightforward way to retrieve data from sources that Terraform
doesn't natively support..
* website: documentation for the "external" provider
Kit Sunde