* cli: show workspace name in destroy confirmation
If the workspace name is not "default", include it in the confirmation
message for `terraform destroy`.
Fixes#15480
This was already added to triton-go and is now making its way to
the manta backend
```
% acctests backend/remote-state/manta
=== RUN TestBackend_impl
--- PASS: TestBackend_impl (0.00s)
=== RUN TestBackend
--- PASS: TestBackend (27.36s)
=== RUN TestBackendLocked
--- PASS: TestBackendLocked (16.24s)
=== RUN TestRemoteClient_impl
--- PASS: TestRemoteClient_impl (0.00s)
=== RUN TestRemoteClient
--- PASS: TestRemoteClient (3.40s)
=== RUN TestRemoteClientLocks
--- PASS: TestRemoteClientLocks (7.17s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/backend/remote-state/manta
```
Fixes: #17314
We now deal correctly with the creation of the state file - we were
not dealing well with a ResourceNotFound error
Now that this has been changed around, we try and create the statefile
and if there is an error, we look for an existing statefile - previously
this was not the order of operations
Simplify the use of clistate.Lock by creating a clistate.Locker
instance, which stores the context of locking a state, to allow unlock
to be called without knowledge of how the state was locked.
This alows the backend code to bring the needed UI methods to the point
where the state is locked, and still unlock the state from an outer
scope.
Provide a NoopLocker as well, so that callers can always call Unlock
without verifying the status of the lock.
Add the StateLocker field to the backend.Operation, so that the state
lock can be carried between the different function scopes of the backend
code. This will allow the backend context to lock the state before it's
read, while allowing the different operations to unlock the state when
they complete.
Fix the now failing state unlock test by reporting the correct ID.
The ID used by GCS is the generation number of the info object, which
isn't known until the info is already written out. While we can't get
the correct ID from the info data for the error rmessage, we can update
it with the generation number after it's read.
This adds a general test to verify that a remote state backend returns
the expected error type when it cannot lock a state. It then extracts
the ID reported in the error, and attempts to unlock the state using
that ID, which simulated the force-unlock scenario. This is a separate
test, since not all backends have persistent locks that can be unlocked
later.
We also split out the backend test to be called individually as needed.
Moves the nested select statements for backend operations into a single
function. The only difference in this part was that apply called
PersistState, which should be harmless regardless of the type of
operation being run.
If the user wishes to interrupt the running operation, only the first
interrupt was communicated to the operation by canceling the provided
context. A second interrupt would start the shutdown process, but not
communicate this to the running operation. This order of event could
cause partial writes of state.
What would happen is that once the command returns, the plugin system
would stop the provider processes. Once the provider processes dies, all
pending Eval operations would return return with an error, and quickly
cause the operation to complete. Since the backend code didn't know that
the process was shutting down imminently, it would continue by
attempting to write out the last known state. Under the right
conditions, the process would exit part way through the writing of the
state file.
Add Stop and Cancel CancelFuncs to the RunningOperation, to allow it to
easily differentiate between the two signals. The backend will then be
able to detect a shutdown and abort more gracefully.
In order to ensure that the backend is not in the process of writing the
state out, the command will always attempt to wait for the process to
complete after cancellation.
Since an early version of Terraform, the `destroy` command has always
had the `-force` flag to allow an auto approval of the interactive
prompt. 0.11 introduced `-auto-approve` as default to `false` when using
the `apply` command.
The `-auto-approve` flag was introduced to reduce ambiguity of it's
function, but the `-force` flag was never updated for a destroy.
People often use wrappers when automating commands in Terraform, and the
inconsistency between `apply` and `destroy` means that additional logic
must be added to the wrappers to do similar functions. Both commands are
more or less able to run with similar syntax, and also heavily share
their code.
This commit updates the command in `destroy` to use the `-auto-approve` flag
making working with the Terraform CLI a more consistent experience.
We leave in `-force` in `destroy` for the time-being and flag it as
deprecated to ensure a safe switchover period.
Internally, triton-go has changed how it handles errors. We can now get rid of
checking strings for errors, and we have introduced an errors library that
wraps some of the major errors we encounter and test for
Triton Manta allows an account other than the main triton account to be used via RBAC.
Here we expose the SDC_USER / TRITON_USER options to the backend so that a user can be specified.
This creates a unique bucket name for each test, so that the tests in
parallel don't collide, and buckets left over from interrupted tests
don't cause future failures.
Also make sure that buckets are removed, regardless of content.
The backend was creating bucket named in the configuration if it didn't
exist. We don't allow other backends to do this, because these are not
managed resources that terraform can control.
Previously there was a problem with double-locking when using the GCS backend with the terraform_remote_state data source.
Here we adjust the locking methodology to avoid that problem.
Validation is the best time to return detailed diagnostics
to the user since we're much more likely to have source
location information, etc than we are in later operations.
This change doesn't actually add any detail to the messages
yet, but it changes the interface so that we can gradually
introduce more detailed diagnostics over time.
While here there are some minor adjustments to some of the
messages to improve their consistency with terminology we
use elsewhere.
Sander van Harmelen