To aid in tracking down the error that's causing
TestAccGoogleSqlDatabaseInstance_basic to fail (it's claiming an op
can't be found?) I've added the op name (which is unique) to the error
output for op errors.
Our GCP storage tests are really flaky right now due to rate limiting.
In theory, this could also impact Terraform users that are
deleting/creating large numbers of Google Cloud Storage buckets at once.
To fix, I'm detecting the specific error code that GCP returns when it's
a rate limit error, and using that with resource.Retry to try the
request again.
* Vendor google.golang.org/api/cloudbilling/v1
* providers/google: Add cloudbilling client
* providers/google: google_project supports billing account
This change allows a Terraform user to set and update the billing
account associated with their project.
* providers/google: Testing project billing account
This change adds optional acceptance tests for project billing accounts.
GOOGLE_PROJECT_BILLING_ACCOUNT and GOOGLE_PROJECT_BILLING_ACCOUNT_2
must be set in the environment for the tests to run; otherwise, they
will be skipped.
Also includes a few code cleanups per review.
* providers/google: Improve project billing error message
* provider/google-cloud: Add maintenance window
Allows specification of the `maintenance_window` within the `settings`
block. This controls when Google will restart a database in order to
apply updates. It is also possible to select an `update_track` to
relatively control updating between instances in the same project.
* Adjustments as suggested in code review.
Our delete operation for google_compute_project_metadata didn't check an
error when making the call to delete metadata, which led to a panic in
our tests. This is also probably indicative of why our tests
failed/metadata got left dangling.
Our DNS tests were using terraform.test as a DNS name, which GCP was
erroring on, as we haven't proven we own the domain (and can't, as we
don't). To solve this, I updated the tests to use hashicorptest.com,
which we _do_ own, and which we have proven ownership of. The tests now
pass.
This changes removes read of the deprecated `policy_data` attr in
the `google_project` resource.
0.8.5 introduced new behavior that incorrectly read the `policy_data`
field during the read lifecycle event. This caused Terraform to
assume it owned not just policy defined in the data source, but
everything that was associated with the project. Migrating from 0.8.4
to 0.8.5, this would cause the config (partial) to be compared to the
state (complete, as it was read from the API) and assume some
policies had been explicitly deleted. Terraform would then delete them.
Fixes#11556
Cloud SQL Gen 2 instances come with a default 'root'@'%' user on
creation. This change automatically deletes that user after creation. A
Terraform user must use the google_sql_user to create a user with
appropriate host and password.
Add support for creating, updating, and deleting projects, as well as
their enabled services and their IAM policies.
Various concessions were made for backwards compatibility, and will be
removed in 0.9 or 0.10.
* removes region param from backend_service
- this param was not being used in this service
- you need a regional_backend_service if you want to pass this
* deprecated region instead of outright removing
* put session affinity formatting back
* providers/google: add support for encrypting a disk
* providers/google: Add docs for encrypting disks
* providers/google: CSEK small fixes: sensitive params and mismatched state files
* Add subnetwork_project field to allow for XPN in GCE instance templates
* Missing os import
* Removing unneeded check
* fix formatting
* Add subnetwork_project to read
As brought up in #10174, our update_strategy property for instance group
managers in GCP would always be set to "RESTART" on read, even if the
user asked for them to be "NONE" in the config.
This adds a test to ensure that the user wishes were respected, which
fails until we check for update_strategy in the ResourceData before we
update it within the Read function. Because the update_strategy property
doesn't map to anything in the API, we never need to read it from
anywhere but the config, which means the ResourceData should be
considered authoritative by the time we get to the Read function.
The fix for this was provided by @JDiPierro in #10198 originally, but
was missing tests, so it got squashed into this.
Paddy