fixes#9110
An error was found where, static_routes_only was not set on a vpn
connection import. This commit introduces setting the static_routes_only
to false when no Options are found. This follows the AWS convention as follows:
```
- options (structure)
Indicates whether the VPN connection requires static routes. If you are creating a VPN connection for a device that does not support BGP, you must specify true .
Default: false
```
So we take it that `static_options_only` is false by default
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSVpnConnection_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/02 10:38:18 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSVpnConnection_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSVpnConnection_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSVpnConnection_importBasic (178.29s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSVpnConnection_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSVpnConnection_basic (336.81s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSVpnConnection_withoutStaticRoutes
--- PASS: TestAccAWSVpnConnection_withoutStaticRoutes (195.45s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 710.572s
```
* Implemented EventHubs
* Missing the sidebar link
* Fixing the type
* Fixing the docs for Namespace
* Removing premium tests
* Checking the correct status code on delete
* Added a test case for the import
* Documentation for importing
* Fixing a typo
The documentation mentions ownership of both VPCs for aws_vpc_peering_connection auto_accept to work but if both VPC are in separate accounts it does not matter if both account are owned or not.
In #6843 its stated that aws_vpc_peering_connection only works if both VPC are in the same AWS account.
The documentation fails to mention that peeing of two VPCs in two different regions is not supported by AWS.
Use this data source to get the ARN of a certificate in AWS Certificate
Manager (ACM). The process of requesting and verifying a certificate in ACM
requires some manual steps, which means that Terraform cannot automate the
creation of ACM certificates. But using this data source, you can reference
them by domain without having to hard code the ARNs as input.
The acceptance test included requires an ACM certificate be pre-created
in and information about it passed in via environment variables. It's a
bit sad but there's really no other way to do it.
* GH-8755 - Adding in support to attach ASG to ELB as independent action
* GH-8755 - Adding in docs
* GH-8755 - Adjusting attribute name and responding to other PR feedback
* provider/aws: Provide the option to skip_destroy on
aws_volume_attachment
When you want to attach and detach pre-existing EBS volumes to an
instance, we would do that as follows:
```
resource "aws_instance" "web" {
ami = "ami-21f78e11"
availability_zone = "us-west-2a"
instance_type = "t1.micro"
tags {
Name = "HelloWorld"
}
}
data "aws_ebs_volume" "ebs_volume" {
filter {
name = "size"
values = ["${aws_ebs_volume.example.size}"]
}
filter {
name = "availability-zone"
values = ["${aws_ebs_volume.example.availability_zone}"]
}
filter {
name = "tag:Name"
values = ["TestVolume"]
}
}
resource "aws_volume_attachment" "ebs_att" {
device_name = "/dev/sdh"
volume_id = "${data.aws_ebs_volume.ebs_volume.id}"
instance_id = "${aws_instance.web.id}"
skip_destroy = true
}
```
The issue here is that when we run a terraform destroy command, the volume tries to get detached from a running instance and goes into a non-responsive state. We would have to force_destroy the volume at that point and risk losing any data on it.
This PR introduces the idea of `skip_destroy` on a volume attachment. tl;dr:
We want the volume to be detached from the instane when the instance itself has been destroyed. This way the normal shut procedures will happen and protect the disk for attachment to another instance
Volume Attachment Tests:
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSVolumeAttachment_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/02 00:47:27 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSVolumeAttachment_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSVolumeAttachment_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSVolumeAttachment_basic (133.49s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSVolumeAttachment_skipDestroy
--- PASS: TestAccAWSVolumeAttachment_skipDestroy (119.64s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 253.158s
```
EBS Volume Tests:
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSEBSVolume_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/02 01:00:18 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSEBSVolume_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSEBSVolume_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEBSVolume_importBasic (26.38s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSEBSVolume_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEBSVolume_basic (26.86s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSEBSVolume_NoIops
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEBSVolume_NoIops (27.89s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSEBSVolume_withTags
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEBSVolume_withTags (26.88s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 108.032s
```
* Update volume_attachment.html.markdown
This will allows us to filter a specific ebs_volume for attachment to an
aws_instance
```
make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSEbsVolumeDataSource_'✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/01 12:39:19 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSEbsVolumeDataSource_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSEbsVolumeDataSource_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEbsVolumeDataSource_basic (28.74s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSEbsVolumeDataSource_multipleFilters
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEbsVolumeDataSource_multipleFilters (28.37s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws57.145s
```
Specifically:
- User data is available in all regions, so remove the sentence saying
to check for supported features in each region.
- Clarify domain vs. DNS record resources.
- Explain which DNS record types the `weight`, `port`, and `priority`
arguments are applicable for.
Ben Jordan