Generate bucket names and object names per test instead of once at the
top level. Should help avoid failures like this one:
https://travis-ci.org/hashicorp/terraform/jobs/100254008
All storage tests checked on this commit:
```
TF_ACC=1 go test -v ./builtin/providers/google -run TestAccGoogleStorage
=== RUN TestAccGoogleStorageBucketAcl_basic
--- PASS: TestAccGoogleStorageBucketAcl_basic (8.90s)
=== RUN TestAccGoogleStorageBucketAcl_upgrade
--- PASS: TestAccGoogleStorageBucketAcl_upgrade (14.18s)
=== RUN TestAccGoogleStorageBucketAcl_downgrade
--- PASS: TestAccGoogleStorageBucketAcl_downgrade (12.83s)
=== RUN TestAccGoogleStorageBucketAcl_predefined
--- PASS: TestAccGoogleStorageBucketAcl_predefined (4.51s)
=== RUN TestAccGoogleStorageObject_basic
--- PASS: TestAccGoogleStorageObject_basic (3.77s)
=== RUN TestAccGoogleStorageObjectAcl_basic
--- PASS: TestAccGoogleStorageObjectAcl_basic (4.85s)
=== RUN TestAccGoogleStorageObjectAcl_upgrade
--- PASS: TestAccGoogleStorageObjectAcl_upgrade (7.68s)
=== RUN TestAccGoogleStorageObjectAcl_downgrade
--- PASS: TestAccGoogleStorageObjectAcl_downgrade (7.37s)
=== RUN TestAccGoogleStorageObjectAcl_predefined
--- PASS: TestAccGoogleStorageObjectAcl_predefined (4.16s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/google 68.275s
```
Conflicts:
builtin/providers/google/provider.go
builtin/providers/google/resource_subscription.go
builtin/providers/google/resource_subscription_test.go
golang pubsub SDK has been released. moved topics/subscriptions to use that
Conflicts:
builtin/providers/google/provider.go
builtin/providers/google/resource_subscription.go
builtin/providers/google/resource_subscription_test.go
file renames and add documentation files
remove typo'd merge and type file move
add to index page as well
only need to define that once
remove topic_computed schema value
I think this was used at one point but is no longer. away.
cleanup typo
adds a couple more config values
- ackDeadlineSeconds: number of seconds to wait for an ack
- pushAttributes: attributes of a push subscription
- pushEndpoint: target for a push subscription
rearrange to better match current conventions
respond to all of the comments
In #3501 @lwander got us almost all the way there, but we still had
tests failing. This seemed to be because GCE sets
`metadata.startup-script` to a blank string on instance creation, and if
a user specifies any `metadata` in their config this is seen as the
desired full contents of metadata, so we get a diff trying to remove
`startup-script`.
Here, to address this, we just proactively remove the "startup-script"
key from `Read`, and then we enforce that "metadata_startup_script"
is the only way to configure startup scripts on instances.
Common metadata state is now stored
Optimistic locking support added to common_metadata
Revisions to keys in project metadata are now reflected in the project state
Wrote tests for project metadata (all pass)
Relaxed test conditions to work on projects with extra keys
Added documentation for project metadata
The v0.beta is removed, so I also removed it from here. Strangely
enough I cannot find any code that actually used it other then in being
instantiated in the provider config func.
Additionally:
Update CHANGELOG
Make cooldown period optional for autoscaler
Refactor autoscaler and add more error checking
Instance template now supports image aliases
Replace instance group manager 'size' -- use target_size (now writeable)
Add documentation for autoscaler
Add beta warnings to docs
In order to fix the failing test in the preceding commit when optional
params are changed from their default "computed" values.
These weren't working well with `HttpHealthCheck.Patch()` because it was
attempting to set all unspecified params to Go's type defaults (eg. 0 for
int64) which the API rejected.
Changing the call to `HttpHealthCheck.Update()` seemed to fix this but it
still didn't allow you to reset a param back to it's default by no longer
specifying it.
Settings defaults like this, which match the Terraform docs, seems like the
best all round solution. Includes two additional tests for the acceptance
tests which verify the params are really getting set correctly.
By first creating a very simple resource that mostly uses the default
values and then changing the two thresholds from their computed defaults.
This currently fails with the following error and will be fixed in a
subsequent commit:
--- FAIL: TestAccComputeHttpHealthCheck_update (5.58s)
testing.go:131: Step 1 error: Error applying: 1 error(s) occurred:
* 1 error(s) occurred:
* 1 error(s) occurred:
* Error patching HttpHealthCheck: googleapi: Error 400: Invalid value for field 'resource.port': '0'. Must be greater than or equal to 1
More details:
Reason: invalid, Message: Invalid value for field 'resource.port': '0'. Must be greater than or equal to 1
Reason: invalid, Message: Invalid value for field 'resource.checkIntervalSec': '0'. Must be greater than or equal to 1
Reason: invalid, Message: Invalid value for field 'resource.timeoutSec': '0'. Must be greater than or equal to 1
Mixture of hard and soft tabs, which isn't picked up by `go fmt` because
it's inside a string. Standardise on hard-tabs since that is what's used
in the rest of the code.
It doesn't need to be a List of Maps, it can just be a Map.
We're also safe to remove a previous workaround I stuck in there.
The config parsing is equivalent between a list of maps and a plain map,
so we just need a state migration to make this backwards compatible.
fixes#1508
In a DESTROY/CREATE scenario, the plan diff will be run against the
state of the old instance, while the apply diff will be run against an
empty state (because the state is cleared when the destroy node does its
thing.)
For complex attributes, this can result in keys that seem to disappear
between the two diffs, when in reality everything is working just fine.
Same() needs to take into account this scenario by analyzing NewRemoved
and treating as "Same" a diff that does indeed have that key removed.
If a given resource does not define an `Update` function, then all of
its attributes must be specified as `ForceNew`, lest Applys fail with
"doesn't support update" like #1367.
This is something we can detect automatically, so this adds a check for
it when we validate provider implementations.
Paul Hinze