Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Raphael Randschau b52bf2c887 provider/scaleway: clarify scaleway_server volume attribute (#14772)
system volumes on scaleway can't easily be modified - instead one has to create
a new image with the desired system volume size. This is way out of scope of
terraform - see https://community.online.net/t/expanding-lssd/907/2 for steps on
how to build a new image.

the `scaleway_server` `volume` attribute should only be used if you want to
attach additional volumes to a server which will share the lifetime of the
server, e.g. they will be destroyed once the server is shut down.

To have volumes which outlive the attached server one should use
`scaleway_volume` and `scaleway_volume_attachement` instead.
2017-05-24 11:31:27 +01:00
Max Riveiro 137fcfb5de
Massively add HCL source tag in docs Markdown files
Signed-off-by: Max Riveiro <kavu13@gmail.com>
2017-04-17 13:17:54 +03:00
George Christou 61277c0dbd website/docs: Run `terraform fmt` on code examples (#12075)
* docs/vsphere: Fix code block

* docs: Convert `...` to `# ...` to allow `terraform fmt`ing

* docs: Trim trailing whitespace

* docs: First-pass run of `terraform fmt` on code examples
2017-02-19 00:48:50 +02:00
Ollie Ford ed2b959f7e Fix contradiction in terms with provider documentation (#10815) (#10874)
* Remove contradiction with Scaleway documentation

The parameters previously termed by Terraform:

1. Organization
2. Access key

Are referred to, respectively, by Scaleway [0] as:

1. Access key
2. Token

which is a confusing contradiction for a user.

Since Scaleway terms (1) both 'access key' [0] and 'organization ID' [1],
@nicolai86 suggested keeping the latter as already used, but changing (2) for
'token'; removing the contradiction.

This commit thus changes the parameters to:

1. Organization
2. Token

Closes #10815.

[0] - https://cloud.scaleway.com/#/credentials
[1] - https://www.scaleway.com/docs/retrieve-my-organization-id-throught-the-api

* Update docs to reflect Scaleway offering x86

Scaleway now provides x86 servers [0] as well as ARM.

This commit removes 'ARM' from various references suggesting that might be the
only option.

[0] - https://blog.online.net/2016/03/08/c2-insanely-affordable-x64-servers/
2017-01-17 12:02:55 +00:00
Raphael Randschau 98d84680b7 provider/scaleway server volume property (#9695)
* provider/scaleway: extract volume validation helpers

* provider/scaleway: add server volume property

fixes #9499

* provider/scaleway: update `scaleway_server` docu

* provider/scaleway: fix volume handling

this actually broken when merging the latest SDK update :(

* provider/scaleway: fix volume attachment

* provider/scaleway: fix volume expectation
2016-10-29 12:07:35 +01:00
James Nugent fc2d973e26 Merge pull request #9387 from nicolai86/feat/scaleway-import
provider/scaleway: add support for importing resources
2016-10-18 08:11:09 -05:00
Raphael Randschau fc4c848778
provider/scaleway: add importer support 2016-10-15 23:49:14 +02:00
Raphael Randschau 5cba23bf7b
provider/scaleway: fix headline in docs 2016-10-15 14:29:11 +02:00
Raphael Randschau 9f314a3c29 provider/scaleway: Expose IPv6 support, improve documentation (#7784)
* provider/scaleway: update api version

* provider/scaleway: expose ipv6 support, rename ip attributes

since it can be both ipv4 and ipv6, choose a more generic name.

* provider/scaleway: allow servers in different SGs

* provider/scaleway: update documentation

* provider/scaleway: Update docs with security group

* provider/scaleway: add testcase for server security groups

* provider/scaleway: make deleting of security rules more resilient

* provider/scaleway: make deletion of security group more resilient

* provider/scaleway: guard against missing server
2016-07-25 12:49:09 +01:00
Raphael Randschau 9081cabd6e Add scaleway provider (#7331)
* Add scaleway provider

this PR allows the entire scaleway stack to be managed with terraform

example usage looks like this:

```
provider "scaleway" {
  api_key = "snap"
  organization = "snip"
}

resource "scaleway_ip" "base" {
  server = "${scaleway_server.base.id}"
}

resource "scaleway_server" "base" {
  name = "test"
  # ubuntu 14.04
  image = "aecaed73-51a5-4439-a127-6d8229847145"
  type = "C2S"
}

resource "scaleway_volume" "test" {
  name = "test"
  size_in_gb = 20
  type = "l_ssd"
}

resource "scaleway_volume_attachment" "test" {
  server = "${scaleway_server.base.id}"
  volume = "${scaleway_volume.test.id}"
}

resource "scaleway_security_group" "base" {
  name = "public"
  description = "public gateway"
}

resource "scaleway_security_group_rule" "http-ingress" {
  security_group = "${scaleway_security_group.base.id}"

  action = "accept"
  direction = "inbound"
  ip_range = "0.0.0.0/0"
  protocol = "TCP"
  port = 80
}

resource "scaleway_security_group_rule" "http-egress" {
  security_group = "${scaleway_security_group.base.id}"

  action = "accept"
  direction = "outbound"
  ip_range = "0.0.0.0/0"
  protocol = "TCP"
  port = 80
}
```

Note that volume attachments require the server to be stopped, which can lead to
downtimes of you attach new volumes to already used servers

* Update IP read to handle 404 gracefully

* Read back resource on update

* Ensure IP detachment works as expected

Sadly this is not part of the official scaleway api just yet

* Adjust detachIP helper

based on feedback from @QuentinPerez in
https://github.com/scaleway/scaleway-cli/pull/378

* Cleanup documentation

* Rename api_key to access_key

following @stack72 suggestion and rename the provider api_key for more clarity

* Make tests less chatty by using custom logger
2016-07-13 21:03:41 +01:00