core: Refactor stub repetition data generation
This commit is contained in:
parent
ad995322e1
commit
ef0d859af7
|
@ -46,9 +46,6 @@ func (n *NodeValidatableResource) Execute(ctx EvalContext, op walkOperation) (di
|
|||
diags = diags.Append(n.validateCheckRules(ctx, n.Config))
|
||||
|
||||
if managed := n.Config.Managed; managed != nil {
|
||||
hasCount := n.Config.Count != nil
|
||||
hasForEach := n.Config.ForEach != nil
|
||||
|
||||
// Validate all the provisioners
|
||||
for _, p := range managed.Provisioners {
|
||||
if p.Connection == nil {
|
||||
|
@ -58,7 +55,7 @@ func (n *NodeValidatableResource) Execute(ctx EvalContext, op walkOperation) (di
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Validate Provisioner Config
|
||||
diags = diags.Append(n.validateProvisioner(ctx, p, hasCount, hasForEach))
|
||||
diags = diags.Append(n.validateProvisioner(ctx, p))
|
||||
if diags.HasErrors() {
|
||||
return diags
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -70,7 +67,7 @@ func (n *NodeValidatableResource) Execute(ctx EvalContext, op walkOperation) (di
|
|||
// validateProvisioner validates the configuration of a provisioner belonging to
|
||||
// a resource. The provisioner config is expected to contain the merged
|
||||
// connection configurations.
|
||||
func (n *NodeValidatableResource) validateProvisioner(ctx EvalContext, p *configs.Provisioner, hasCount, hasForEach bool) tfdiags.Diagnostics {
|
||||
func (n *NodeValidatableResource) validateProvisioner(ctx EvalContext, p *configs.Provisioner) tfdiags.Diagnostics {
|
||||
var diags tfdiags.Diagnostics
|
||||
|
||||
provisioner, err := ctx.Provisioner(p.Type)
|
||||
|
@ -91,7 +88,7 @@ func (n *NodeValidatableResource) validateProvisioner(ctx EvalContext, p *config
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Validate the provisioner's own config first
|
||||
configVal, _, configDiags := n.evaluateBlock(ctx, p.Config, provisionerSchema, hasCount, hasForEach)
|
||||
configVal, _, configDiags := n.evaluateBlock(ctx, p.Config, provisionerSchema)
|
||||
diags = diags.Append(configDiags)
|
||||
|
||||
if configVal == cty.NilVal {
|
||||
|
@ -115,42 +112,14 @@ func (n *NodeValidatableResource) validateProvisioner(ctx EvalContext, p *config
|
|||
// configuration keys that are not valid for *any* communicator, catching
|
||||
// typos early rather than waiting until we actually try to run one of
|
||||
// the resource's provisioners.
|
||||
_, _, connDiags := n.evaluateBlock(ctx, p.Connection.Config, connectionBlockSupersetSchema, hasCount, hasForEach)
|
||||
_, _, connDiags := n.evaluateBlock(ctx, p.Connection.Config, connectionBlockSupersetSchema)
|
||||
diags = diags.Append(connDiags)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return diags
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (n *NodeValidatableResource) evaluateBlock(ctx EvalContext, body hcl.Body, schema *configschema.Block, hasCount, hasForEach bool) (cty.Value, hcl.Body, tfdiags.Diagnostics) {
|
||||
keyData := EvalDataForNoInstanceKey
|
||||
selfAddr := n.ResourceAddr().Resource.Instance(addrs.NoKey)
|
||||
|
||||
if hasCount {
|
||||
// For a resource that has count, we allow count.index but don't
|
||||
// know at this stage what it will return.
|
||||
keyData = InstanceKeyEvalData{
|
||||
CountIndex: cty.UnknownVal(cty.Number),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// "self" can't point to an unknown key, but we'll force it to be
|
||||
// key 0 here, which should return an unknown value of the
|
||||
// expected type since none of these elements are known at this
|
||||
// point anyway.
|
||||
selfAddr = n.ResourceAddr().Resource.Instance(addrs.IntKey(0))
|
||||
} else if hasForEach {
|
||||
// For a resource that has for_each, we allow each.value and each.key
|
||||
// but don't know at this stage what it will return.
|
||||
keyData = InstanceKeyEvalData{
|
||||
EachKey: cty.UnknownVal(cty.String),
|
||||
EachValue: cty.DynamicVal,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// "self" can't point to an unknown key, but we'll force it to be
|
||||
// key "" here, which should return an unknown value of the
|
||||
// expected type since none of these elements are known at
|
||||
// this point anyway.
|
||||
selfAddr = n.ResourceAddr().Resource.Instance(addrs.StringKey(""))
|
||||
}
|
||||
func (n *NodeValidatableResource) evaluateBlock(ctx EvalContext, body hcl.Body, schema *configschema.Block) (cty.Value, hcl.Body, tfdiags.Diagnostics) {
|
||||
keyData, selfAddr := n.stubRepetitionData(n.Config.Count != nil, n.Config.ForEach != nil)
|
||||
|
||||
return ctx.EvaluateBlock(body, schema, selfAddr, keyData)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -487,9 +456,7 @@ func (n *NodeValidatableResource) evaluateExpr(ctx EvalContext, expr hcl.Express
|
|||
return result, diags
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (n *NodeValidatableResource) validateCheckRules(ctx EvalContext, config *configs.Resource) tfdiags.Diagnostics {
|
||||
var diags tfdiags.Diagnostics
|
||||
|
||||
func (n *NodeValidatableResource) stubRepetitionData(hasCount, hasForEach bool) (instances.RepetitionData, addrs.Referenceable) {
|
||||
keyData := EvalDataForNoInstanceKey
|
||||
selfAddr := n.ResourceAddr().Resource.Instance(addrs.NoKey)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -520,6 +487,14 @@ func (n *NodeValidatableResource) validateCheckRules(ctx EvalContext, config *co
|
|||
selfAddr = n.ResourceAddr().Resource.Instance(addrs.StringKey(""))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return keyData, selfAddr
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (n *NodeValidatableResource) validateCheckRules(ctx EvalContext, config *configs.Resource) tfdiags.Diagnostics {
|
||||
var diags tfdiags.Diagnostics
|
||||
|
||||
keyData, selfAddr := n.stubRepetitionData(n.Config.Count != nil, n.Config.ForEach != nil)
|
||||
|
||||
for _, cr := range config.Preconditions {
|
||||
_, conditionDiags := n.evaluateExpr(ctx, cr.Condition, cty.Bool, nil, keyData)
|
||||
diags = diags.Append(conditionDiags)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ func TestNodeValidatableResource_ValidateProvisioner_valid(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
diags := node.validateProvisioner(ctx, pc, false, false)
|
||||
diags := node.validateProvisioner(ctx, pc)
|
||||
if diags.HasErrors() {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("node.Eval failed: %s", diags.Err())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ func TestNodeValidatableResource_ValidateProvisioner__warning(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
diags := node.validateProvisioner(ctx, pc, false, false)
|
||||
diags := node.validateProvisioner(ctx, pc)
|
||||
if len(diags) != 1 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("wrong number of diagnostics in %s; want one warning", diags.ErrWithWarnings())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ func TestNodeValidatableResource_ValidateProvisioner__connectionInvalid(t *testi
|
|||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
diags := node.validateProvisioner(ctx, pc, false, false)
|
||||
diags := node.validateProvisioner(ctx, pc)
|
||||
if !diags.HasErrors() {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("node.Eval succeeded; want error")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue