ResiLien
/
terraform
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #30421 from hashicorp/alisdair/plan-write-state-ordering 

core: Fix plan write/state write ordering bug
This commit is contained in:
Alisdair McDiarmid 2022-01-27 08:56:00 -05:00 committed by GitHub
parent 64c7743793 e21d5d36f4
commit b8709d3690
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 16 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

18
internal/terraform/node_resource_plan_instance.go
View File

@ -206,6 +206,22 @@ func (n *NodePlannableResourceInstance) managedResourceExecute(ctx EvalContext)
return diags
}
// FIXME: it is currently important that we write resource changes to
// the plan (n.writeChange) before we write the corresponding state
// (n.writeResourceInstanceState).
//
// This is because the planned resource state will normally have the
// status of states.ObjectPlanned, which causes later logic to refer to
// the contents of the plan to retrieve the resource data. Because
// there is no shared lock between these two data structures, reversing
// the order of these writes will cause a brief window of inconsistency
// which can lead to a failed safety check.
//
// Future work should adjust these APIs such that it is impossible to
// update these two data structures incorrectly through any objects
// reachable via the terraform.EvalContext API.
diags = diags.Append(n.writeChange(ctx, change, ""))
diags = diags.Append(n.writeResourceInstanceState(ctx, instancePlanState, workingState))
if diags.HasErrors() {
return diags
@ -224,8 +240,6 @@ func (n *NodePlannableResourceInstance) managedResourceExecute(ctx EvalContext)
return diags
}
}
diags = diags.Append(n.writeChange(ctx, change, ""))
} else {
// Even if we don't plan changes, we do still need to at least update
// the working state to reflect the refresh result. If not, then e.g.