Merge pull request #27131 from hashicorp/pselle/double-marks
Avoid double-marking variables
This commit is contained in:
commit
ae025248cc
|
@ -5603,6 +5603,12 @@ func TestContext2Plan_variableSensitivityModule(t *testing.T) {
|
||||||
Providers: map[addrs.Provider]providers.Factory{
|
Providers: map[addrs.Provider]providers.Factory{
|
||||||
addrs.NewDefaultProvider("aws"): testProviderFuncFixed(p),
|
addrs.NewDefaultProvider("aws"): testProviderFuncFixed(p),
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
|
Variables: InputValues{
|
||||||
|
"another_var": &InputValue{
|
||||||
|
Value: cty.StringVal("boop"),
|
||||||
|
SourceType: ValueFromCaller,
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
})
|
})
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
plan, diags := ctx.Plan()
|
plan, diags := ctx.Plan()
|
||||||
|
@ -5628,21 +5634,32 @@ func TestContext2Plan_variableSensitivityModule(t *testing.T) {
|
||||||
switch i := ric.Addr.String(); i {
|
switch i := ric.Addr.String(); i {
|
||||||
case "module.child.aws_instance.foo":
|
case "module.child.aws_instance.foo":
|
||||||
checkVals(t, objectVal(t, schema, map[string]cty.Value{
|
checkVals(t, objectVal(t, schema, map[string]cty.Value{
|
||||||
"foo": cty.StringVal("foo"),
|
"foo": cty.StringVal("foo"),
|
||||||
|
"value": cty.StringVal("boop"),
|
||||||
}), ric.After)
|
}), ric.After)
|
||||||
if len(res.ChangeSrc.BeforeValMarks) != 0 {
|
if len(res.ChangeSrc.BeforeValMarks) != 0 {
|
||||||
t.Errorf("unexpected BeforeValMarks: %#v", res.ChangeSrc.BeforeValMarks)
|
t.Errorf("unexpected BeforeValMarks: %#v", res.ChangeSrc.BeforeValMarks)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if len(res.ChangeSrc.AfterValMarks) != 1 {
|
if len(res.ChangeSrc.AfterValMarks) != 2 {
|
||||||
t.Errorf("unexpected AfterValMarks: %#v", res.ChangeSrc.AfterValMarks)
|
t.Errorf("expected AfterValMarks to contain two elements: %#v", res.ChangeSrc.AfterValMarks)
|
||||||
continue
|
continue
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
pvm := res.ChangeSrc.AfterValMarks[0]
|
// validate that the after marks have "foo" and "value"
|
||||||
if got, want := pvm.Path, cty.GetAttrPath("foo"); !got.Equals(want) {
|
contains := func(pvmSlice []cty.PathValueMarks, stepName string) bool {
|
||||||
t.Errorf("unexpected path for mark\n got: %#v\nwant: %#v", got, want)
|
for _, pvm := range pvmSlice {
|
||||||
|
if pvm.Path.Equals(cty.GetAttrPath(stepName)) {
|
||||||
|
if pvm.Marks.Equal(cty.NewValueMarks("sensitive")) {
|
||||||
|
return true
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
return false
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if got, want := pvm.Marks, cty.NewValueMarks("sensitive"); !got.Equal(want) {
|
if !contains(res.ChangeSrc.AfterValMarks, "foo") {
|
||||||
t.Errorf("unexpected value for mark\n got: %#v\nwant: %#v", got, want)
|
t.Error("unexpected AfterValMarks to contain \"foo\" with sensitive mark")
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
if !contains(res.ChangeSrc.AfterValMarks, "value") {
|
||||||
|
t.Error("unexpected AfterValMarks to contain \"value\" with sensitive mark")
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
default:
|
default:
|
||||||
t.Fatal("unknown instance:", i)
|
t.Fatal("unknown instance:", i)
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -297,7 +297,8 @@ func (d *evaluationStateData) GetInputVariable(addr addrs.InputVariable, rng tfd
|
||||||
val = cty.UnknownVal(wantType)
|
val = cty.UnknownVal(wantType)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if config.Sensitive {
|
// Mark if sensitive, and avoid double-marking if this has already been marked
|
||||||
|
if config.Sensitive && !val.HasMark("sensitive") {
|
||||||
val = val.Mark("sensitive")
|
val = val.Mark("sensitive")
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -99,11 +99,20 @@ func TestEvaluatorGetInputVariable(t *testing.T) {
|
||||||
Sensitive: true,
|
Sensitive: true,
|
||||||
Default: cty.StringVal("foo"),
|
Default: cty.StringVal("foo"),
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
|
// Avoid double marking a value
|
||||||
|
"some_other_var": {
|
||||||
|
Name: "some_other_var",
|
||||||
|
Sensitive: true,
|
||||||
|
Default: cty.StringVal("bar"),
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
VariableValues: map[string]map[string]cty.Value{
|
VariableValues: map[string]map[string]cty.Value{
|
||||||
"": {"some_var": cty.StringVal("bar")},
|
"": {
|
||||||
|
"some_var": cty.StringVal("bar"),
|
||||||
|
"some_other_var": cty.StringVal("boop").Mark("sensitive"),
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
VariableValuesLock: &sync.Mutex{},
|
VariableValuesLock: &sync.Mutex{},
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -124,6 +133,18 @@ func TestEvaluatorGetInputVariable(t *testing.T) {
|
||||||
if !got.RawEquals(want) {
|
if !got.RawEquals(want) {
|
||||||
t.Errorf("wrong result %#v; want %#v", got, want)
|
t.Errorf("wrong result %#v; want %#v", got, want)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
want = cty.StringVal("boop").Mark("sensitive")
|
||||||
|
got, diags = scope.Data.GetInputVariable(addrs.InputVariable{
|
||||||
|
Name: "some_other_var",
|
||||||
|
}, tfdiags.SourceRange{})
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if len(diags) != 0 {
|
||||||
|
t.Errorf("unexpected diagnostics %s", spew.Sdump(diags))
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
if !got.RawEquals(want) {
|
||||||
|
t.Errorf("wrong result %#v; want %#v", got, want)
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
func TestEvaluatorGetResource(t *testing.T) {
|
func TestEvaluatorGetResource(t *testing.T) {
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -2,6 +2,12 @@ variable "foo" {
|
||||||
type = string
|
type = string
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
resource "aws_instance" "foo" {
|
// "bar" is defined as sensitive by both the parent and the child
|
||||||
foo = var.foo
|
variable "bar" {
|
||||||
|
sensitive = true
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
resource "aws_instance" "foo" {
|
||||||
|
foo = var.foo
|
||||||
|
value = var.bar
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -3,7 +3,12 @@ variable "sensitive_var" {
|
||||||
sensitive = true
|
sensitive = true
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
variable "another_var" {
|
||||||
|
sensitive = true
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
module "child" {
|
module "child" {
|
||||||
source = "./child"
|
source = "./child"
|
||||||
foo = var.sensitive_var
|
foo = var.sensitive_var
|
||||||
|
bar = var.another_var
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue