update comments around evaluating 0 instances
This commit is contained in:
parent
ced7aedeca
commit
a3c9d7abc1
|
@ -658,24 +658,21 @@ func (d *evaluationStateData) GetResource(addr addrs.Resource, rng tfdiags.Sourc
|
|||
case config.ForEach != nil:
|
||||
return cty.EmptyObjectVal, diags
|
||||
default:
|
||||
// FIXME: try to prove this path should not be reached during plan.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// while we can reference an expanded resource with 0
|
||||
// While we can reference an expanded resource with 0
|
||||
// instances, we cannot reference instances that do not exist.
|
||||
// Since we haven't ensured that all instances exist in all
|
||||
// cases (this path only ever returned unknown), only log this as
|
||||
// an error for now, and continue to return a DynamicVal
|
||||
// Due to the fact that we may have direct references to
|
||||
// instances that may end up in a root output during destroy
|
||||
// (since a planned destroy cannot yet remove root outputs), we
|
||||
// need to return a dynamic value here to allow evaluation to
|
||||
// continue.
|
||||
log.Printf("[ERROR] unknown instance %q referenced during plan", addr.Absolute(d.ModulePath))
|
||||
return cty.DynamicVal, diags
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
default:
|
||||
// we must return DynamicVal so that both interpretations
|
||||
// can proceed without generating errors, and we'll deal with this
|
||||
// in a later step where more information is gathered.
|
||||
// (In practice we should only end up here during the validate walk,
|
||||
// We should only end up here during the validate walk,
|
||||
// since later walks should have at least partial states populated
|
||||
// for all resources in the configuration.)
|
||||
// for all resources in the configuration.
|
||||
return cty.DynamicVal, diags
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue