Add support for for_each for data blocks.

This also fixes a few things with resource for_each:

It makes validation more like validation for count.

It makes sure the index is stored in the state properly.

configs/parser_config_test.go

@@ -114,6 +114,11 @@ func TestParserLoadConfigFileFailureMessages(t *testing.T) {
 			hcl.DiagError,
 			`Invalid combination of "count" and "for_each"`,
 		},
+		{
+			"invalid-files/data-count-and-for_each.tf",
+			hcl.DiagError,
+			`Invalid combination of "count" and "for_each"`,
+		},
 		{
 			"invalid-files/resource-lifecycle-badbool.tf",
 			hcl.DiagError,

configs/resource.go

@@ -302,13 +302,15 @@ func decodeDataBlock(block *hcl.Block) (*Resource, hcl.Diagnostics) {
 
 	if attr, exists := content.Attributes["for_each"]; exists {
 		r.ForEach = attr.Expr
-		// We currently parse this, but don't yet do anything with it.
+		// Cannot have count and for_each on the same data block
-		diags = append(diags, &hcl.Diagnostic{
+		if r.Count != nil {
-			Severity: hcl.DiagError,
+			diags = append(diags, &hcl.Diagnostic{
-			Summary:  "Reserved argument name in module block",
+				Severity: hcl.DiagError,
-			Detail:   fmt.Sprintf("The name %q is reserved for use in a future version of Terraform.", attr.Name),
+				Summary:  `Invalid combination of "count" and "for_each"`,
-			Subject:  &attr.NameRange,
+				Detail:   `The "count" and "for_each" meta-arguments are mutually-exclusive, only one should be used to be explicit about the number of resources to be created.`,
-		})
+				Subject:  &attr.NameRange,
+			})
+		}
 	}
 
 	if attr, exists := content.Attributes["provider"]; exists {

configs/testdata/invalid-files/data-count-and-for-each.tf

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+data "test" "foo" {
+  count = 2
+  for_each = ["a"]
+}

terraform/eval_for_each.go

@@ -14,29 +14,50 @@ import (
 // the expression is nil, and is used to distinguish between an unset for_each and an
 // empty map
 func evaluateResourceForEachExpression(expr hcl.Expression, ctx EvalContext) (forEach map[string]cty.Value, diags tfdiags.Diagnostics) {
+	forEachMap, known, diags := evaluateResourceForEachExpressionKnown(expr, ctx)
+	if !known {
+		// Currently this is a rather bad outcome from a UX standpoint, since we have
+		// no real mechanism to deal with this situation and all we can do is produce
+		// an error message.
+		// FIXME: In future, implement a built-in mechanism for deferring changes that
+		// can't yet be predicted, and use it to guide the user through several
+		// plan/apply steps until the desired configuration is eventually reached.
+		diags = diags.Append(&hcl.Diagnostic{
+			Severity: hcl.DiagError,
+			Summary:  "Invalid forEach argument",
+			Detail:   `The "for_each" value depends on resource attributes that cannot be determined until apply, so Terraform cannot predict how many instances will be created. To work around this, use the -target argument to first apply only the resources that the for_each depends on.`,
+		})
+		panic("uh-oh")
+	}
+	return forEachMap, diags
+}
+
+// evaluateResourceForEachExpressionKnown is like evaluateResourceForEachExpression
+// except that it handles an unknown result by returning an empty map and
+// a known = false, rather than by reporting the unknown value as an error
+// diagnostic.
+func evaluateResourceForEachExpressionKnown(expr hcl.Expression, ctx EvalContext) (forEach map[string]cty.Value, known bool, diags tfdiags.Diagnostics) {
 	if expr == nil {
-		return nil, nil
+		return nil, true, nil
 	}
 
 	forEachVal, forEachDiags := ctx.EvaluateExpr(expr, cty.DynamicPseudoType, nil)
 	diags = diags.Append(forEachDiags)
 	if diags.HasErrors() {
-		return nil, diags
+		return nil, true, diags
 	}
 
-	// No-op for dynamic types, so that these pass validation, but are then populated at apply
+	switch {
-	if forEachVal.Type() == cty.DynamicPseudoType {
+	case forEachVal.IsNull():
-		return nil, diags
-	}
-
-	if forEachVal.IsNull() {
 		diags = diags.Append(&hcl.Diagnostic{
 			Severity: hcl.DiagError,
 			Summary:  "Invalid for_each argument",
 			Detail:   `The given "for_each" argument value is unsuitable: the given "for_each" argument value is null. A map, or set of strings is allowed.`,
 			Subject:  expr.Range().Ptr(),
 		})
-		return nil, diags
+		return nil, true, diags
+	case !forEachVal.IsKnown():
+		return map[string]cty.Value{}, false, diags
 	}
 
 	if !forEachVal.CanIterateElements() || forEachVal.Type().IsListType() {
@@ -46,7 +67,7 @@ func evaluateResourceForEachExpression(expr hcl.Expression, ctx EvalContext) (fo
 			Detail:   fmt.Sprintf(`The given "for_each" argument value is unsuitable: the "for_each" argument must be a map, or set of strings, and you have provided a value of type %s.`, forEachVal.Type().FriendlyName()),
 			Subject:  expr.Range().Ptr(),
 		})
-		return nil, diags
+		return nil, true, diags
 	}
 
 	if forEachVal.Type().IsSetType() {
@@ -57,17 +78,14 @@ func evaluateResourceForEachExpression(expr hcl.Expression, ctx EvalContext) (fo
 				Detail:   fmt.Sprintf(`The given "for_each" argument value is unsuitable: "for_each" supports maps and sets of strings, but you have provided a set containing type %s.`, forEachVal.Type().ElementType().FriendlyName()),
 				Subject:  expr.Range().Ptr(),
 			})
-			return nil, diags
+			return nil, true, diags
 		}
 	}
 
 	// If the map is empty ({}), return an empty map, because cty will return nil when representing {} AsValueMap
-	// Also return an empty map if the value is not known -- as this function
+	if forEachVal.LengthInt() == 0 {
-	// is used to check if the for_each value is valid as well as to apply it, the empty
+		return map[string]cty.Value{}, true, diags
-	// map will later be filled in.
-	if !forEachVal.IsKnown() || forEachVal.LengthInt() == 0 {
-		return map[string]cty.Value{}, diags
 	}
 
-	return forEachVal.AsValueMap(), nil
+	return forEachVal.AsValueMap(), true, nil
 }

terraform/eval_state.go

@@ -424,15 +424,21 @@ func (n *EvalWriteResourceState) Eval(ctx EvalContext) (interface{}, error) {
 		return nil, diags.Err()
 	}
 
-	// Currently we ony support NoEach and EachList, because for_each support
-	// is not fully wired up across Terraform. Once for_each support is added,
-	// we'll need to handle that here too, setting states.EachMap if the
-	// assigned expression is a map.
 	eachMode := states.NoEach
 	if count >= 0 { // -1 signals "count not set"
 		eachMode = states.EachList
 	}
 
+	forEach, forEachDiags := evaluateResourceForEachExpression(n.Config.ForEach, ctx)
+	diags = diags.Append(forEachDiags)
+	if forEachDiags.HasErrors() {
+		return nil, diags.Err()
+	}
+
+	if forEach != nil {
+		eachMode = states.EachMap
+	}
+
 	// This method takes care of all of the business logic of updating this
 	// while ensuring that any existing instances are preserved, etc.
 	state.SetResourceMeta(absAddr, eachMode, n.ProviderAddr)

terraform/eval_validate.go

@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ func (n *EvalValidateResource) Eval(ctx EvalContext) (interface{}, error) {
 		}
 
 		// Evaluate the for_each expression here so we can expose the diagnostics
-		_, forEachDiags := evaluateResourceForEachExpression(n.Config.ForEach, ctx)
+		forEachDiags := n.validateForEach(ctx, n.Config.ForEach)
 		diags = diags.Append(forEachDiags)
 	}
 
@@ -553,3 +553,18 @@ func (n *EvalValidateResource) validateCount(ctx EvalContext, expr hcl.Expressio
 
 	return diags
 }
+
+func (n *EvalValidateResource) validateForEach(ctx EvalContext, expr hcl.Expression) (diags tfdiags.Diagnostics) {
+	_, known, forEachDiags := evaluateResourceForEachExpressionKnown(expr, ctx)
+	// If the value isn't known then that's the best we can do for now, but
+	// we'll check more thoroughly during the plan walk
+	if !known {
+		return diags
+	}
+
+	if forEachDiags.HasErrors() {
+		diags = diags.Append(forEachDiags)
+	}
+
+	return diags
+}

terraform/node_data_refresh.go

@@ -38,6 +38,16 @@ func (n *NodeRefreshableDataResource) DynamicExpand(ctx EvalContext) (*Graph, er
 		return nil, nil
 	}
 
+	forEachMap, forEachKnown, forEachDiags := evaluateResourceForEachExpressionKnown(n.Config.ForEach, ctx)
+	if forEachDiags.HasErrors() {
+		return nil, diags.Err()
+	}
+	if !forEachKnown {
+		// If the for_each isn't known yet, we'll skip refreshing and try expansion
+		// again during the plan walk.
+		return nil, nil
+	}
+
 	// Next we need to potentially rename an instance address in the state
 	// if we're transitioning whether "count" is set at all.
 	fixResourceCountSetTransition(ctx, n.ResourceAddr(), count != -1)
@@ -77,6 +87,7 @@ func (n *NodeRefreshableDataResource) DynamicExpand(ctx EvalContext) (*Graph, er
 			Concrete: concreteResource,
 			Schema:   n.Schema,
 			Count:    count,
+			ForEach:  forEachMap,
 			Addr:     n.ResourceAddr(),
 		},
 
@@ -85,6 +96,7 @@ func (n *NodeRefreshableDataResource) DynamicExpand(ctx EvalContext) (*Graph, er
 		&OrphanResourceCountTransformer{
 			Concrete: concreteResourceDestroyable,
 			Count:    count,
+			ForEach:  forEachMap,
 			Addr:     n.ResourceAddr(),
 			State:    state,
 		},