Tidy eval_diff assignments and update plan action
When the sensitivity has changed, we want to write to state and also display to the user that the sensitivity has changed, so make this an update action. Also clean up some assignments, since Contains traverses the val anyway, this is a little tighter.
This commit is contained in:
parent
33cbf2698d
commit
7c2ec1640a
|
@ -212,23 +212,11 @@ func (n *EvalDiff) Eval(ctx EvalContext) (interface{}, error) {
|
||||||
return nil, diags.Err()
|
return nil, diags.Err()
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Create an unmarked version of our config val, defaulting
|
// Create an unmarked version of our config val and our prior val.
|
||||||
// to the configVal so we don't do the work of unmarking unless
|
// Store the paths for the config val to re-markafter
|
||||||
// necessary
|
|
||||||
unmarkedConfigVal := configValIgnored
|
|
||||||
var unmarkedPaths []cty.PathValueMarks
|
|
||||||
if configValIgnored.ContainsMarked() {
|
|
||||||
// store the marked values so we can re-mark them later after
|
|
||||||
// we've sent things over the wire.
|
// we've sent things over the wire.
|
||||||
unmarkedConfigVal, unmarkedPaths = configValIgnored.UnmarkDeepWithPaths()
|
unmarkedConfigVal, unmarkedPaths := configValIgnored.UnmarkDeepWithPaths()
|
||||||
}
|
unmarkedPriorVal, priorPaths := priorVal.UnmarkDeep()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
unmarkedPriorVal := priorVal
|
|
||||||
if priorVal.ContainsMarked() {
|
|
||||||
// store the marked values so we can re-mark them later after
|
|
||||||
// we've sent things over the wire.
|
|
||||||
unmarkedPriorVal, _ = priorVal.UnmarkDeep()
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
proposedNewVal := objchange.ProposedNewObject(schema, unmarkedPriorVal, unmarkedConfigVal)
|
proposedNewVal := objchange.ProposedNewObject(schema, unmarkedPriorVal, unmarkedConfigVal)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -395,8 +383,7 @@ func (n *EvalDiff) Eval(ctx EvalContext) (interface{}, error) {
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Unmark for this test for equality. If only sensitivity has changed,
|
// Unmark for this test for value equality.
|
||||||
// this does not require an Update or Replace
|
|
||||||
eqV := unmarkedPlannedNewVal.Equals(unmarkedPriorVal)
|
eqV := unmarkedPlannedNewVal.Equals(unmarkedPriorVal)
|
||||||
eq := eqV.IsKnown() && eqV.True()
|
eq := eqV.IsKnown() && eqV.True()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -406,6 +393,11 @@ func (n *EvalDiff) Eval(ctx EvalContext) (interface{}, error) {
|
||||||
action = plans.Create
|
action = plans.Create
|
||||||
case eq:
|
case eq:
|
||||||
action = plans.NoOp
|
action = plans.NoOp
|
||||||
|
// If we plan to write or delete sensitive paths from state,
|
||||||
|
// this is an Update action
|
||||||
|
if len(priorPaths) != len(unmarkedPaths) {
|
||||||
|
action = plans.Update
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
case !reqRep.Empty():
|
case !reqRep.Empty():
|
||||||
// If there are any "requires replace" paths left _after our filtering
|
// If there are any "requires replace" paths left _after our filtering
|
||||||
// above_ then this is a replace action.
|
// above_ then this is a replace action.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue