Merge pull request #22230 from tmccombs/for_each_provision
Support using self in the provisioner of resources that use for_each
This commit is contained in:
commit
6ed09cbc4d
|
@ -112,11 +112,12 @@ func (n *EvalValidateProvider) Eval(ctx EvalContext) (interface{}, error) {
|
|||
// the configuration of a provisioner belonging to a resource. The provisioner
|
||||
// config is expected to contain the merged connection configurations.
|
||||
type EvalValidateProvisioner struct {
|
||||
ResourceAddr addrs.Resource
|
||||
Provisioner *provisioners.Interface
|
||||
Schema **configschema.Block
|
||||
Config *configs.Provisioner
|
||||
ResourceHasCount bool
|
||||
ResourceAddr addrs.Resource
|
||||
Provisioner *provisioners.Interface
|
||||
Schema **configschema.Block
|
||||
Config *configs.Provisioner
|
||||
ResourceHasCount bool
|
||||
ResourceHasForEach bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (n *EvalValidateProvisioner) Eval(ctx EvalContext) (interface{}, error) {
|
||||
|
@ -198,6 +199,19 @@ func (n *EvalValidateProvisioner) evaluateBlock(ctx EvalContext, body hcl.Body,
|
|||
// expected type since none of these elements are known at this
|
||||
// point anyway.
|
||||
selfAddr = n.ResourceAddr.Instance(addrs.IntKey(0))
|
||||
} else if n.ResourceHasForEach {
|
||||
// For a resource that has for_each, we allow each.value and each.key
|
||||
// but don't know at this stage what it will return.
|
||||
keyData = InstanceKeyEvalData{
|
||||
EachKey: cty.UnknownVal(cty.String),
|
||||
EachValue: cty.DynamicVal,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// "self" can't point to an unknown key, but we'll force it to be
|
||||
// key "" here, which should return an unknown value of the
|
||||
// expected type since none of these elements are known at
|
||||
// this point anyway.
|
||||
selfAddr = n.ResourceAddr.Instance(addrs.StringKey(""))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return ctx.EvaluateBlock(body, schema, selfAddr, keyData)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ func (n *NodeValidatableResource) EvalTree() EvalNode {
|
|||
|
||||
if managed := n.Config.Managed; managed != nil {
|
||||
hasCount := n.Config.Count != nil
|
||||
hasForEach := n.Config.ForEach != nil
|
||||
|
||||
// Validate all the provisioners
|
||||
for _, p := range managed.Provisioners {
|
||||
|
@ -74,11 +75,12 @@ func (n *NodeValidatableResource) EvalTree() EvalNode {
|
|||
Schema: &provisionerSchema,
|
||||
},
|
||||
&EvalValidateProvisioner{
|
||||
ResourceAddr: addr.Resource,
|
||||
Provisioner: &provisioner,
|
||||
Schema: &provisionerSchema,
|
||||
Config: p,
|
||||
ResourceHasCount: hasCount,
|
||||
ResourceAddr: addr.Resource,
|
||||
Provisioner: &provisioner,
|
||||
Schema: &provisionerSchema,
|
||||
Config: p,
|
||||
ResourceHasCount: hasCount,
|
||||
ResourceHasForEach: hasForEach,
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue