Initial draft of Core Workflow Guide

website/guides/core-workflow.html.md

@@ -0,0 +1,335 @@
+---
+layout: "guides"
+page_title: "The Core Terraform Workflow - Guides"
+sidebar_current: "guides-core-workflow"
+description: |-
+  This guide provides an overview of the core Terraform workflow and how it
+  applies in individual, team, and organization contexts across Terraform open
+  source and Terraform Enterprise.
+---
+
+# The Core Terraform Workflow
+
+The core Terraform workflow has three steps:
+
+1. **Write** - Author infrastructure as code.
+2. **Plan** - Preview changes before applying.
+3. **Apply** - Provision reproducible infrastructure.
+
+This guide walks through how each of these three steps plays out in the context
+of working as an individual practitioner, how they evolve when a team is
+collaborating on infrastructure, and how Terraform Enterprise enables this
+workflow to run smoothly for entire organizations.
+
+## Working as an Individual Practitioner
+ 
+Let's first walk through how these parts fit together as an individual working
+on infrastructure as code.
+
+### Write
+
+You write Terraform configuration just like you write code: in your editor of
+choice. It's common practice to store your work in a version controlled
+repository even when you're just operating as an individual.
+
+```sh
+# Create repository
+$ git init my-infra && cd my-infra
+
+Initialized empty Git repository in /.../my-infra/.git/
+
+# Write initial config
+$ vim main.tf
+
+# Initialize Terraform
+$ terraform init
+
+Initializing provider plugins...
+# ...
+Terraform has been successfully initialized!
+```
+
+As you make progress on authoring your config, repeatedly running plans can help
+flush out syntax errors and ensure that your config is coming together as you
+expect.
+
+```sh
+# Make edits to config
+$ vim main.tf
+
+# Review plan
+$ terraform plan
+
+# Make additional edits, and repeat
+$ vim main.tf
+```
+
+This parallels working on application code as an individual, where a tight
+feedback loop between editing code and running test commands is useful.
+
+### Plan
+
+When the feedback loop of the Write step has yielded a change that looks good,
+it's time to commit your work and review the final plan.
+
+```sh
+$ git add main.tf
+$ git commit -m 'Managing infrastructure as code!'
+
+[master (root-commit) f735520] Managing infrastructure as code!
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
+```
+
+Because `terraform apply` will display a plan for confirmation before
+proceeding to change any infrastructure, that's the command you run for final
+review.
+
+```sh
+$ terraform apply
+
+An execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
+# ...
+```
+
+### Apply
+
+After one last check, you are ready to tell Terraform to provision real
+infrastructure.
+
+```sh
+Do you want to perform these actions?
+
+  Terraform will perform the actions described above.
+  Only 'yes' will be accepted to approve.
+  Enter a value: yes
+
+# ...
+
+Apply complete! Resources: 1 added, 0 changed, 0 destroyed.
+```
+
+At this point, it's common to push your version control repository to a remote
+location for safekeeping.
+
+```sh
+$ git remote add origin https://github.com/*user*/*repo*.git
+$ git push origin master
+```
+
+This core workflow is a loop; the next time you want to make changes, you start
+the process over from the beginning.
+
+Notice how closely this workflow parallels the process of writing application
+code or scripts as an individual? This is what we mean when we talk about
+Terraform enabling infrastructure as code.
+
+## Working as a Team
+
+Once multiple people are collaborating on Terraform configuration, new steps
+must be added to each part of the core workflow to ensure everyone is working
+together smoothly. You'll see that many of these steps parallel the workflow
+changes we make when we work on application code as teams rather than as
+individuals.
+
+### Write
+
+While each individual on a team still makes changes to Terraform configuration
+in their editor of choice, they save their changes to version control _branches_
+to avoid colliding with each other's work. Working in branches enables team
+members to resolve mutually incompatible infrastructure changes using their
+normal merge conflict workflow.
+
+```sh
+$ git checkout -b add-load-balancer
+
+Switched to a new branch 'add-load-balancer'
+```
+
+Running iterative plans is still useful as a feedback loop while authoring
+configuration, though having each team member's computer able to run them
+becomes more difficult with time. As the team and the infrastructure grows, so
+does the number of sensitive input variables (e.g. API Keys, SSL Cert Pairs)
+required to run a plan.
+
+To avoid the burden and the security risk of each team member arranging all
+sensitive inputs locally, it's common for teams to migrate to a model in which
+Terraform operations are executed in a shared Continuous Integration (CI)
+environment. The work needed to create such a CI environment is nontrivial, and
+is outside the scope of this core workflow overview, but a full deep dive on
+this topic can be found in our
+[Running Terraform in Automation](https://www.terraform.io/guides/running-terraform-in-automation.html)
+guide.
+
+This longer iteration cycle of committing changes to version control and then
+waiting for the CI pipeline to execute is often lengthy enough to prohibit using
+speculative plans as a feedback loop while authoring individual Terraform
+configuration changes. Speculative plans are still useful before new Terraform
+changes are applied or even merged to the main development branch, however, as
+we'll see in a minute.
+
+### Plan
+
+For teams collaborating on infrastructure, Terraform's plan output creates an
+opportunity for team members to review each other's work. This allows the team
+to ask questions, evaluate risks, and catch mistakes before any potentially
+harmful changes are made.
+
+The natural place for these reviews to occur is alongside pull requests within
+version control--the point at which an individual proposes a merge from their
+working branch to the shared team branch. If team members review proposed
+config changes alongside speculative plan output, they can evaluate whether the
+intent of the change is being achieved by the plan.
+
+The problem becomes producing that speculative plan output for the team to
+review. Some teams that still run Terraform locally make a practice that pull
+requests should include an attached copy of speculative plan output generated
+by the change author. Others arrange for their CI system to post speculative
+plan output to pull requests automatically.
+
+![Screenshot of Pull Request with manually posted Terraform plan output](guides/core-workflow/manually-pasted-plan-output.png)
+
+In addition to reviewing the plan for the proper expression of its author's
+intent, the team can also make an evaluation whether they want this change to
+happen now. For example, if a team notices that a certain change could result
+in service disruption, they may decide to delay merging its pull request until
+they can schedule a maintenance window.
+
+### Apply
+
+Once a pull request has been approved and merged, it's important for the team
+to review the final concrete plan that's run against the shared team branch and
+the latest version of the state file.
+
+This plan has the potential to be different than the one reviewed on the pull
+request due to issues like merge order or recent infrastructural changes. For
+example, if a manual change was made to your infrastructure since the plan was
+reviewed, the plan might be different when you merge.
+
+It is at this point that the team asks questions about the potential
+implications of applying the change. Do we expect any service disruption from
+this change? Is there any part of this change that is high risk? Is there
+anything in our system that we should be watching as we apply this? Is there
+anyone we need to notify that this change is happening?
+
+Depending on the change, sometimes team members will want to watch the apply
+output as it is happening. For teams that are running Terraform locally, this
+may involve a screen share with the team. For teams running Terraform in CI,
+this may involve gathering around the build log.
+
+Just like the workflow for individuals, the core workflow for teams is a loop
+that plays out for each change. For some teams this loop happens a few times a
+week, for others, many times a day.
+
+## The Core Workflow Enhanced by Terraform Enterprise
+
+While the above described workflows enable the safe, predictable, and
+reproducible creating or changing of infrastructure, there are multiple
+collaboration points that can be streamlined, especially as teams and
+organizations scale.  We designed Terraform Enterprise to support and enhance
+the core Terraform workflow for anyone collaborating on infrastructure, from
+small teams to large organizations. Let's look at how Terraform Enterprise makes
+for a better experience at each step.
+
+### Write
+
+Terraform Enterprise provides a centralized and secure location for storing
+input variables and state while also bringing back a tight feedback loop for
+speculative plans for config authors. Terraform configuration interacts with
+Terraform Enterprise via the ["remote" backend](/docs/backends/types/remote.html).
+
+```
+terraform {
+  backend "remote" {
+    organization = "my-org"
+    workspaces {
+      prefix = "my-app-"
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+Once the backend is wired up, a Terraform Enterprise API key is all that's
+needed by team members to be able to edit config and run speculative plans
+against the latest version of the state file using all the remotely stored
+input variables.
+
+```sh
+$ terraform workspace select my-app-dev
+Switched to workspace "my-app-dev".
+
+$ terraform plan
+
+Running plan remotely in Terraform Enterprise.
+
+Output will stream here. To view this plan in a browser, visit:
+
+https://app.terraform.io/my-org/my-app-dev/.../
+
+Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
+
+# ...
+
+Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy.
+```
+
+With the assistance of this plan output, team members can each work on
+authoring config until it is ready to propose as a change via a pull request.
+
+### Plan
+
+Once a pull request is ready for review, Terraform Enterprise makes the process
+of reviewing a speculative plan easier for team members. First, the plan is
+automatically run when the pull request is created. Status updates to the pull
+request indicate while the plan is in progress.
+
+Once the plan is complete, the status update indicates whether there were any
+changes in the speculative plan, right from the pull request view.
+
+<!-- TODO: [ Screenshot of PR with preview details ] -->
+
+For certain types of changes, this information is all that's needed for a team
+member to be able to approve the pull request. When a teammate needs to do a
+full review of the plan, clicking the link to Terraform Enterprise brings up a
+view that allows them to quickly analyze the full plan details.
+
+<!-- TODO: [ Screenshot of speculative plan details page ] -->
+
+This page allows the reviewer to quickly determine if the plan is matching the
+config author's intent and evaluate the risk of the change.
+
+### Apply
+
+After merge, Terraform Enterprise presents the concrete plan to the team for
+review and approval.
+
+![Screenshot of concrete plan](guides/core-workflow/concrete-plan.png)
+
+The team can discuss any outstanding questions about the plan before the change
+is made.
+
+![Screenshot of back-and-forth in TFE comments](guides/core-workflow/plan-comments.png)
+
+Once the Apply is confirmed, Terraform Enterprise displays the progress live
+to anyone who'd like to watch.
+
+![Screenshot of in-progress Apply](guides/core-workflow/in-progress-apply.png)
+
+<!--
+
+TODO: Add this back in w/ screenshot of notification
+
+And after the change completes, the team can be notified of its outcome.
+
+    [ Multi-screenshot of Slack alert indicating Apply completed successfully and
+    with error; except it's not gonna be Slack anymore? ]
+
+-->
+
+## Conclusion
+
+There are many different ways to use Terraform: as an individual user, a single
+team, or an entire organization at scale. Choosing the best approach for the
+density of collaboration needed will provide the most return on your investment
+in the core Terraform workflow. For organizations using Terraform at scale,
+Terraform Enterprise introduces new layers that build on this core workflow to
+solve problems unique to teams and organizations.

website/layouts/guides.erb

@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@
         <a href="/intro/getting-started/install.html">Getting Started</a>
       </li>
 
+      <li<%= sidebar_current("guides-core-workflow") %>>
+        <a href="/guides/core-workflow.html">The Core Terraform Workflow</a>
+      </li>
+
       <li<%= sidebar_current("recommended-practices") %>><a href="/docs/enterprise/guides/recommended-practices/index.html">Terraform Recommended Practices</a>
         <ul class="nav">
           <li<%= sidebar_current("recommended-practices-1") %>><a href="/docs/enterprise/guides/recommended-practices/part1.html">Part 1: Workflow Overview</a></li>