ResiLien
/
terraform
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

use the full provider name for CloseProvider 

CloseProviderTransformer wasn't using the full provider when creating
the graph node, so the Close wasn't actually being called on the
provider.
This commit is contained in:
James Bardin 2018-01-04 15:03:27 -05:00
parent ba749db9ed
commit 6210b1749b
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
terraform/transform_provider.go
View File

@ -138,13 +138,13 @@ func (t *CloseProviderTransformer) Transform(g *Graph) error {
p := v.(GraphNodeProvider) p := v.(GraphNodeProvider)
// get the close provider of this type if we alread created it // get the close provider of this type if we alread created it
closer := cpm[p.ProviderName()] closer := cpm[p.Name()]
if closer == nil { if closer == nil {
// create a closer for this provider type // create a closer for this provider type
closer = &graphNodeCloseProvider{ProviderNameValue: p.ProviderName()} closer = &graphNodeCloseProvider{ProviderNameValue: p.Name()}
g.Add(closer) g.Add(closer)
cpm[p.ProviderName()] = closer cpm[p.Name()] = closer
} }
// Close node depends on the provider itself // Close node depends on the provider itself
@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ type graphNodeCloseProvider struct {
} }
func (n *graphNodeCloseProvider) Name() string { func (n *graphNodeCloseProvider) Name() string {
return fmt.Sprintf("provider.%s (close)", n.ProviderNameValue) return n.ProviderNameValue + " (close)"
} }
// GraphNodeEvalable impl. // GraphNodeEvalable impl.