From 1a371c3c49d6fd56649efc9d95679bb543728ee5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Litvinenko Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 19:50:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Small spelling improvement It seems that the word `with` is redundant in the following sentence: > For a module with without count or for_each, the address will not... --- website/docs/configuration/modules.html.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/website/docs/configuration/modules.html.md b/website/docs/configuration/modules.html.md index 397942ac2..88430218e 100644 --- a/website/docs/configuration/modules.html.md +++ b/website/docs/configuration/modules.html.md @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ we have declared `for_each` on the module block. When using the `count` argument [`count`](/docs/configuration/resources.html#the-count-object) object is available. Resources from child modules are prefixed with `module.module_name[module index]` -when displayed in plan output and elsewhere in the UI. For a module with without +when displayed in plan output and elsewhere in the UI. For a module without `count` or `for_each`, the address will not contain the module index as the module's name suffices to reference the module.