diff --git a/website/intro/vs/boto.html.markdown b/website/intro/vs/boto.html.markdown
index f6a2912d6..dd94e2020 100644
--- a/website/intro/vs/boto.html.markdown
+++ b/website/intro/vs/boto.html.markdown
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ layout: "intro"
 page_title: "Terraform vs. Boto, Fog, etc."
 sidebar_current: "vs-other-boto"
 description: |-
-  Libraries like Boto, Fog, etc. are used to provide native access to cloud providers and services by using their APIs. Some libraries are focused on specific clouds, while others attempt to bridge them all and mask the semantic differences. Using a client library only provides low-level access to APIs, requiring application developers to create their own tooling to build and manage their infrastructure.
+  How Terraform compares to cloud provider client libraries. 
 ---
 
 # Terraform vs. Boto, Fog, etc.
@@ -21,4 +21,3 @@ how cloud resources and services should be created, provisioned, and
 combined. Terraform is very flexible, using a plugin-based model to
 support providers and provisioners, giving it the ability to support
 almost any service that exposes APIs.
-