ResiLien
/
terraform
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #27141 from hashicorp/jbardin/ignore_changes 

Fixes for ignore_changes with unintended provider behavior
This commit is contained in:
James Bardin 2020-12-04 12:55:26 -05:00 committed by GitHub
parent 29d89c4a15 4f4e8c17e0
commit 3b4079d451
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
3 changed files with 254 additions and 51 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

126
terraform/context_plan_test.go
View File

@ -6473,3 +6473,129 @@ resource "test_instance" "a" {
}
}
}
// ignore_changes needs to be re-applied to the planned value for provider
// using the LegacyTypeSystem
func TestContext2Plan_legacyProviderIgnoreChanges(t *testing.T) {
m := testModuleInline(t, map[string]string{
"main.tf": `
resource "test_instance" "a" {
lifecycle {
ignore_changes = [data]
}
}
`,
})
p := testProvider("test")
p.PlanResourceChangeFn = func(req providers.PlanResourceChangeRequest) (resp providers.PlanResourceChangeResponse) {
m := req.ProposedNewState.AsValueMap()
// this provider "hashes" the data attribute as bar
m["data"] = cty.StringVal("bar")
resp.PlannedState = cty.ObjectVal(m)
resp.LegacyTypeSystem = true
return resp
}
p.GetSchemaReturn = &ProviderSchema{
ResourceTypes: map[string]*configschema.Block{
"test_instance": {
Attributes: map[string]*configschema.Attribute{
"id": {Type: cty.String, Computed: true},
"data": {Type: cty.String, Optional: true},
},
},
},
}
state := states.NewState()
root := state.EnsureModule(addrs.RootModuleInstance)
root.SetResourceInstanceCurrent(
mustResourceInstanceAddr("test_instance.a").Resource,
&states.ResourceInstanceObjectSrc{
Status: states.ObjectReady,
AttrsJSON: []byte(`{"id":"a","data":"foo"}`),
Dependencies: []addrs.ConfigResource{},
},
mustProviderConfig(`provider["registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/test"]`),
)
ctx := testContext2(t, &ContextOpts{
Config: m,
Providers: map[addrs.Provider]providers.Factory{
addrs.NewDefaultProvider("test"): testProviderFuncFixed(p),
},
State: state,
})
plan, diags := ctx.Plan()
if diags.HasErrors() {
t.Fatal(diags.Err())
}
for _, c := range plan.Changes.Resources {
if c.Action != plans.NoOp {
t.Fatalf("expected no changes, got %s for %q", c.Action, c.Addr)
}
}
}
func TestContext2Plan_validateIgnoreAll(t *testing.T) {
m := testModuleInline(t, map[string]string{
"main.tf": `
resource "test_instance" "a" {
lifecycle {
ignore_changes = all
}
}
`,
})
p := testProvider("test")
p.GetSchemaReturn = &ProviderSchema{
ResourceTypes: map[string]*configschema.Block{
"test_instance": {
Attributes: map[string]*configschema.Attribute{
"id": {Type: cty.String, Computed: true},
"data": {Type: cty.String, Optional: true},
},
},
},
}
p.PlanResourceChangeFn = testDiffFn
p.ValidateResourceTypeConfigFn = func(req providers.ValidateResourceTypeConfigRequest) providers.ValidateResourceTypeConfigResponse {
var diags tfdiags.Diagnostics
if req.TypeName == "test_instance" {
if !req.Config.GetAttr("id").IsNull() {
diags = diags.Append(errors.New("id cannot be set in config"))
}
}
return providers.ValidateResourceTypeConfigResponse{
Diagnostics: diags,
}
}
state := states.NewState()
root := state.EnsureModule(addrs.RootModuleInstance)
root.SetResourceInstanceCurrent(
mustResourceInstanceAddr("test_instance.a").Resource,
&states.ResourceInstanceObjectSrc{
Status: states.ObjectReady,
AttrsJSON: []byte(`{"id":"a","data":"foo"}`),
Dependencies: []addrs.ConfigResource{},
},
mustProviderConfig(`provider["registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/test"]`),
)
ctx := testContext2(t, &ContextOpts{
Config: m,
Providers: map[addrs.Provider]providers.Factory{
addrs.NewDefaultProvider("test"): testProviderFuncFixed(p),
},
State: state,
})
_, diags := ctx.Plan()
if diags.HasErrors() {
t.Fatal(diags.Err())
}
}

118
terraform/eval_diff.go
View File

@ -212,6 +212,24 @@ func (n *EvalDiff) Eval(ctx EvalContext) tfdiags.Diagnostics {
unmarkedConfigVal, unmarkedPaths := origConfigVal.UnmarkDeepWithPaths()
unmarkedPriorVal, priorPaths := priorVal.UnmarkDeepWithPaths()
log.Printf("[TRACE] Re-validating config for %q", n.Addr.Absolute(ctx.Path()))
// Allow the provider to validate the final set of values.
// The config was statically validated early on, but there may have been
// unknown values which the provider could not validate at the time.
// TODO: It would be more correct to validate the config after
// ignore_changes has been applied, but the current implementation cannot
// exclude computed-only attributes when given the `all` option.
validateResp := provider.ValidateResourceTypeConfig(
providers.ValidateResourceTypeConfigRequest{
TypeName: n.Addr.Resource.Type,
Config: unmarkedConfigVal,
},
)
if validateResp.Diagnostics.HasErrors() {
diags = diags.Append(validateResp.Diagnostics.InConfigBody(config.Config))
return diags
}
// ignore_changes is meant to only apply to the configuration, so it must
// be applied before we generate a plan. This ensures the config used for
// the proposed value, the proposed value itself, and the config presented
@ -235,21 +253,6 @@ func (n *EvalDiff) Eval(ctx EvalContext) tfdiags.Diagnostics {
}
}
log.Printf("[TRACE] Re-validating config for %q", n.Addr.Absolute(ctx.Path()))
// Allow the provider to validate the final set of values.
// The config was statically validated early on, but there may have been
// unknown values which the provider could not validate at the time.
validateResp := provider.ValidateResourceTypeConfig(
providers.ValidateResourceTypeConfigRequest{
TypeName: n.Addr.Resource.Type,
Config: configValIgnored,
},
)
if validateResp.Diagnostics.HasErrors() {
diags = diags.Append(validateResp.Diagnostics.InConfigBody(config.Config))
return diags
}
resp := provider.PlanResourceChange(providers.PlanResourceChangeRequest{
TypeName: n.Addr.Resource.Type,
Config: configValIgnored,
@ -322,6 +325,23 @@ func (n *EvalDiff) Eval(ctx EvalContext) tfdiags.Diagnostics {
}
}
if resp.LegacyTypeSystem {
// Because we allow legacy providers to depart from the contract and
// return changes to non-computed values, the plan response may have
// altered values that were already suppressed with ignore_changes.
// A prime example of this is where providers attempt to obfuscate
// config data by turning the config value into a hash and storing the
// hash value in the state. There are enough cases of this in existing
// providers that we must accommodate the behavior for now, so for
// ignore_changes to work at all on these values, we will revert the
// ignored values once more.
plannedNewVal, ignoreChangeDiags = n.processIgnoreChanges(unmarkedPriorVal, plannedNewVal)
diags = diags.Append(ignoreChangeDiags)
if ignoreChangeDiags.HasErrors() {
return diags
}
}
// Add the marks back to the planned new value -- this must happen after ignore changes
// have been processed
unmarkedPlannedNewVal := plannedNewVal
@ -664,47 +684,58 @@ func processIgnoreChangesIndividual(prior, config cty.Value, ignoreChanges []hcl
}
ret, _ := cty.Transform(config, func(path cty.Path, v cty.Value) (cty.Value, error) {
// Easy path for when we are only matching the entire value. The only
// values we break up for inspection are maps.
if !v.Type().IsMapType() {
for _, ignored := range ignoredValues {
if !path.Equals(ignored.path) {
return v, nil
}
// no index, so we can return the entire value
if ignored.key.IsNull() {
if path.Equals(ignored.path) {
return ignored.value, nil
}
}
return v, nil
}
// We now know this must be a map, so we need to accumulate the values
// key-by-key.
// we have an index key, so make sure we have a map
if !v.Type().IsMapType() {
// we'll let other validation catch any type mismatch
if !v.IsNull() && !v.IsKnown() {
// since v is not known, we cannot ignore individual keys
return v, nil
}
// Now we know we are ignoring a specific index of this map, so get
// the config map and modify, add, or remove the desired key.
// The configMap is the current configuration value, which we will
// mutate based on the ignored paths and the prior map value.
var configMap map[string]cty.Value
var priorMap map[string]cty.Value
if !v.IsNull() {
if !v.IsKnown() {
// if the entire map is not known, we can't ignore any
// specific keys yet.
continue
}
switch {
case v.IsNull() || v.LengthInt() == 0:
configMap = map[string]cty.Value{}
default:
configMap = v.AsValueMap()
}
if configMap == nil {
configMap = map[string]cty.Value{}
for _, ignored := range ignoredValues {
if !path.Equals(ignored.path) {
continue
}
// We also need to create a prior map, so we can check for
// existence while getting the value. Value.Index will always
// return null.
if !ignored.value.IsNull() {
priorMap = ignored.value.AsValueMap()
if ignored.key.IsNull() {
// The map address is confirmed to match at this point,
// so if there is no key, we want the entire map and can
// stop accumulating values.
return ignored.value, nil
}
if priorMap == nil {
// Now we know we are ignoring a specific index of this map, so get
// the config map and modify, add, or remove the desired key.
// We also need to create a prior map, so we can check for
// existence while getting the value, because Value.Index will
// return null for a key with a null value and for a non-existent
// key.
var priorMap map[string]cty.Value
switch {
case ignored.value.IsNull() || ignored.value.LengthInt() == 0:
priorMap = map[string]cty.Value{}
default:
priorMap = ignored.value.AsValueMap()
}
key := ignored.key.AsString()
@ -718,14 +749,13 @@ func processIgnoreChangesIndividual(prior, config cty.Value, ignoreChanges []hcl
default:
configMap[key] = priorElem
}
}
if len(configMap) == 0 {
return cty.MapValEmpty(v.Type().ElementType()), nil
}
return cty.MapVal(configMap), nil
}
return v, nil
})
return ret, nil
}

47
terraform/eval_diff_test.go
View File

@ -136,6 +136,53 @@ func TestProcessIgnoreChangesIndividual(t *testing.T) {
"b": cty.StringVal("b value"),
}),
},
"map_index_multiple_keys": {
cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
"a": cty.MapVal(map[string]cty.Value{
"a0": cty.StringVal("a0 value"),
"a1": cty.StringVal("a1 value"),
"a2": cty.StringVal("a2 value"),
"a3": cty.StringVal("a3 value"),
}),
"b": cty.StringVal("b value"),
}),
cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
"a": cty.NullVal(cty.Map(cty.String)),
"b": cty.StringVal("new b value"),
}),
[]string{`a["a1"]`, `a["a2"]`, `a["a3"]`, `b`},
cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
"a": cty.MapVal(map[string]cty.Value{
"a1": cty.StringVal("a1 value"),
"a2": cty.StringVal("a2 value"),
"a3": cty.StringVal("a3 value"),
}),
"b": cty.StringVal("b value"),
}),
},
"map_index_redundant": {
cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
"a": cty.MapVal(map[string]cty.Value{
"a0": cty.StringVal("a0 value"),
"a1": cty.StringVal("a1 value"),
"a2": cty.StringVal("a2 value"),
}),
"b": cty.StringVal("b value"),
}),
cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
"a": cty.NullVal(cty.Map(cty.String)),
"b": cty.StringVal("new b value"),
}),
[]string{`a["a1"]`, `a`, `b`},
cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
"a": cty.MapVal(map[string]cty.Value{
"a0": cty.StringVal("a0 value"),
"a1": cty.StringVal("a1 value"),
"a2": cty.StringVal("a2 value"),
}),
"b": cty.StringVal("b value"),
}),
},
"missing_map_index": {
cty.ObjectVal(map[string]cty.Value{
"a": cty.MapVal(map[string]cty.Value{