terraform/website/upgrade-guides/0-14.html.markdown

---
layout: "guides"
page_title: "Upgrading to Terraform v0.14"
sidebar_current: "upgrade-guides-0-14"
description: |-
  Upgrading to Terraform v0.14
---

# Upgrading to Terraform v0.14

Terraform v0.14 is a major release and so it includes some small changes in
behavior that you may need to consider when upgrading. This guide is intended
to help with that process.

The goal of this guide is to cover the most common upgrade concerns and
issues that would benefit from more explanation and background. The exhaustive
list of changes will always be
[the Terraform Changelog](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/blob/v0.14/CHANGELOG.md).
After reviewing this guide, we recommend reviewing the Changelog to check for
specific notes about less-commonly-used features. This guide is also not
intended as an overview of the new features in Terraform v0.14. This release
includes other enhancements that don't need any special attention during
upgrade, but those are described in the changelog and elsewhere in the
Terraform documentation.

This guide focuses on changes from v0.13 to v0.14. Terraform supports upgrade
tools and features only for one major release upgrade at a time, so if you are
currently using a version of Terraform prior to v0.13 please upgrade through
the latest minor releases of all of the intermediate versions first, reviewing
the previous upgrade guides for any considerations that may be relevant to you.

In particular, Terraform v0.14 no longer includes the `terraform 0.13upgrade`
command for automatically inserting
[provider requirements](/docs/configuration/provider-requirements.html)
into existing modules, and the automatic mechanisms to upgrade legacy provider
references in the Terraform state. You will need to successfully complete a
`terraform apply` at least once under Terraform v0.13 before upgrading an
existing configuration to Terraform v0.14.

-> If you run into any problems during upgrading that are not addressed by the
information in this guide, please feel free to start a topic in
[The Terraform community forum](https://discuss.hashicorp.com/c/terraform-core),
describing the problem you've encountered in enough detail that other readers
may be able to reproduce it and offer advice.

Upgrade guide sections:

* [Before You Upgrade](#before-you-upgrade)
* [Provider Dependency Lock File](#provider-dependency-lock-file)
* [Concise Terraform Plan Output](#concise-terraform-plan-output)
* [Sensitive Values in Plan Output](#sensitive-values-in-plan-output)

## Before You Upgrade

Terraform v0.14 does not support legacy Terraform state snapshot formats from
prior to Terraform v0.13, so before upgrading to Terraform v0.14 you _must_
have successfully run `terraform apply` at least once with Terraform v0.13
so that it can complete its state format upgrades.

When upgrading between major releases, we always recommend ensuring that you
can run `terraform plan` and see no proposed changes on the previous version
first, because otherwise pending changes can add additional unknowns into the
upgrade process. Terraform v0.14 has the additional requirement of running
`terraform apply`, as described above, because that allows Terraform v0.13 to
commit the result of its automatic state format upgrades.

## Provider Dependency Lock File

In Terraform v0.13 and earlier, the `terraform init` command would always
install the newest version of any provider in the configuration that would
meet the configured version constraints.

That meant that unless the configuration author manually entered _exact_
version constraints (for a particular version alone), a later provider release
could potentially cause a change in behavior for an existing configuration even
though the configuration itself had not changed.

We believe that, as far as possible, the behavior of a configuration that has
already been written and tested should remain consistent unless it is
intentionally changed by its author, and that intentional changes should be
represented in files that can be included in a version control system and
code review process.

To better meet that goal, Terraform v0.14 introduces a new
[dependency lock file](/docs/configuration/dependency-lock.html),
which Terraform will generate automatically after running `terraform init`
in the same directory as your configuration's root module. This file includes
the specific version numbers selected for each provider, and also includes
the package checksums for the selected version to help ensure that the
provider packages you were depended on are not changed in-place upstream,
whether accidentally or maliciously.

This new behavior is designed so that for most users it will not require
a significant change in workflow. After running `terraform init` for the
first time after upgrading you will find a new file `.terraform.lock.hcl`
in your root module directory, and `terraform init` will automatically read
and respect the entries in that file on future runs with no additional action
on your part. We strongly recommend that you commit this file to your version
control system, but if you do not then Terraform's behavior will be very similar to
the old v0.13 behavior.

There are some situations that require some further consideration though,
and those are discussed in the following sections.

### Opting out of dependency locking

We understand that not all teams share our belief that upgrades should always
be represented as changes to the code in a version control repository. Those
teams may have previously intentionally used a non-exact version constraint
for one or more providers in order to automatically adopt any future provider
releases and then make any necessary configuration changes in retrospect.

You can continue with a model similar to the v0.13 behavior after upgrading
to v0.14 by placing `.terraform.lock.hcl` in your version control system's
"ignore" file, such as `.gitignore` for Git. In that case, Terraform will
see the lock file in the same way as the internal index that Terraform v0.13
would generate under the `.terraform` directory, preserving the selections
only with in a particular working directory until you delete the file.

With that said, we do recommend that teams consider carefully the benefits
of a persistent lock file, and make a considered decision about which path
to take. We believe that a lock file under version control will be the best
choice for most teams, because we've seen this pattern used successfully in
many other programming language ecosystems.

### In-house providers and internal mirrors

Terraform v0.13 introduced a new heirarchical namespace for providers, which
was an important pre-requisite for introducing a dependency lock file in
v0.14 which can support a mixture of official, partner, community and in-house
providers in a single configuration.

If you followed the advice from the Terraform v0.13 upgrade guide about
[assigning your in-house providers their own unique source addresses](0-13.html#in-house-providers),
and you're distributing your in-house providers to Terraform through one of
the documented mechanisms, Terraform should handle selecting a version and
recording its checksums in the same way for all of the providers you use.

However, the full functionality of the lock file does depend on some
information only available from a real provider registry, so there are some
special considerations for providers installed from either filesystem or
network mirrors:

* Mirror sources don't provide package checksums that are signed by the original
  provider distributor, so by default `terraform init` will record only the
  checksum for the provider package on the platform you are currently using.

  For example, if you run `terraform init` on a macOS system and then commit
  the lock file, a collegue running `terraform init` on a Linux system may
  encounter a checksum error, because the mirror-based installation was only
  able to safely record the checksum for the package it actually installed.

  This problem doesn't arise for installation from a provider registry because
  the registry can provide signed checksums for all packages for a particular
  provider version, across all supported platforms.

  If you use mirrors exclusively in your environment and you use Terraform
  across a mixture of platforms then, in addition to making sure that your
  mirrors include packages for all of the necessary platforms, you may choose
  to use
  [the new `terraform providers lock` command](/docs/commands/providers/lock.html)
  to pre-enter the required lock file entries for all of the platforms you
  intend to use.

* Terraform expects a particular version of a provider to have identical
  package checksums across all installation methods you work with in your
  team.

  For example, if you use direct installation from Terraform registries in
  your development environment but you use a mirror in your production
  automation, you must ensure that the packages available for a particular
  provider version in your mirror are identical to the official packages
  in the origin registry.

  If your internal mirrors intentionally have different packages than are
  available upstream, you must either use your internal mirrors consistently
  (so Terraform never uses or verifies an official package) or you must
  publish your own builds so that Terraform can understand your intent for
  them to be distinct.

  If you are only making minor or temporary changes to a provider, such as
  building for a platform that Terraform doesn't official support or including
  a bugfix patch that isn't yet in an upstream release, the simplest answer
  is to number your local build with semantic versioning _build metadata_,
  such as `v2.1.0+companyname.1` where `v2.1.0` is the upstream release you
  derived yours from, `companyname` is a short mnemonic for your organization,
  and `.1` is an internal build id that you can potentially increment if
  you need to make ongoing new builds from the same upstream version.

  If you are making more substantial changes to a provider, such as adding
  entirely new features that your modules depend on, it may be better to
  instead publish the provider under a separate namespace you control, such
  as publishing a fork of `hashicorp/aws` as `companyname/aws` in the public
  registry or `tf.example.com/companyname/aws` for in-house distribution only.
  This is a more drastic approach in that Terraform will understand your
  release as an entirely separate provider, but it also allows your modules
  to clearly indicate that they depend on the features of your fork rather
  than the features of the upstream release.

  In both cases the dependency lock file will see your releases as distinct
  from the upstream ones and thus expect the two to have a different set of
  checksums each.

### External module dependencies are not locked

Although we do hope to eventually include a means to lock version selections
for external modules in addition to providers, this new capability is limited
only to providers in Terraform v0.14.

Terraform modules have a different approach to distribution and versioning than
Terraform providers, with many different supported installation methods that
each require careful consideration in designing a dependency locking mechanism.

If you wish to lock your module dependencies then for now you must continue
to use the same strategy as for v0.13 and earlier: specify exact version
constraints for modules distributed via a module registry, or use the
source-type-specific mechanisms to lock to a particular version of module
packages retrieved directly using other protocols.

Note that Terraform also does not currently track checksums for external
module dependencies. If you are concerned about the possibility of external
modules being altered in-place without your knowledge, we recommend using
modules only from sources directly under your control, such as a private
Terraform module registry.

## Concise Terraform Plan Output

In Terraform v0.11 and earlier, the output from `terraform plan` was designed
to show only the subset of resource instance attributes that had actually
changed compared to the prior state.

Although that made the output very concise, we heard from several users that
the lack of context in the output had led to some misunderstandings that in
turn caused production outages. We know that reviewing a Terraform plan can
be a point of anxiety for those working on production infrastructure, so we
responded to that feedback in Terraform v0.12 by having the plan output
instead show the full context of each resource instance that has a planned
action, and then use extra annotations (`+`, `-`, `~`) to mark the specific
attributes that will change.

Based on further feedback since the v0.12 release, we understand that the
new detailed output has been very overwhelming for resource types that have
a large number of attributes or deeply nested block structures. Terraform v0.14
introduces a new compromise that aims to still address the concern about
context while allowing better focus on the parts of each object that are
changing.

For this initial release, Terraform will omit from the plan output any
attribute that has not changed, with the exception of a number of attribute
names whose values often contain human-recognizable identifying information.
When attributes or blocks are omitted, Terraform will always include a summary
of what isn't included, to avoid ambiguity with an argument merely being unset.

This is intended as an incremental step to improve the worst cases of verbose
output in Terraform v0.12 and v0.13, but the compromises we made here may not
be suitable for all situations. If you'd like to retain the fully-verbose
output from Terraform v0.13, you can temporarily re-enable it by setting the
environment variable `TF_X_CONCISE_DIFF=0` when you run Terraform.

If you choose to opt out of the new concise mode, please
[open a feature request issue](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/new?labels=enhancement%2C+new&template=feature_request.md)
to let us know what you found lacking in the new output. We intend to continue
iterating on the design tradeoffs here to find the best compromise to suit
the needs of most users. We expect to remove the opt-out environment variable
in Terraform v0.15.

## Sensitive Values in Plan Output

In Terraform v0.13 and earlier, Terraform allowed provider authors to mark
certain resource type attributes as being "sensitive", and similarly allowed
module authors to mark certain output values as "sensitive". Terraform would
then show the placeholder string `(sensitive value)` in the plan output,
instead of the actual value.

Terraform v0.14 introduces a more extensive version of that behavior where
Terraform will track when you write an expression whose result is derived
from a
[sensitive input variable](/docs/configuration/outputs.html#sensitive-suppressing-values-in-cli-output)
or
[sensitive output value](/docs/configuration/variables.html#suppressing-values-in-cli-output),
and so after upgrading to Terraform v0.14 you may find that more values are
obscured in the Terraform plan output than would have been in Terraform v0.13.

For this feature we've taken the approach that it's better to be conservative
and obscure _potentially-sensitive_ values at the expense of potentially also
obscuring some values that aren't sensitive. Unfortunately this means that
if you've written a module in a generic or dynamic way then Terraform may
over-generalize which values are sensitive, leading to less helpful plan output.

Due to the security implications of this feature, Terraform offers no direct
way to opt out of this change. However, the obscuring of these values is done
at the UI layer only and so you can still access the raw values, if needed,
by saving your plan to an plan file and then asking Terraform to present it
in machine-readable JSON format:

```
terraform plan -out=tfplan
terraform show -json tfplan
```

Please note that the binary file `tfplan` and the JSON output produced from it
can both include cleartext representations of sensitive values, so writing
these to disk on a multi-user system or viewing the JSON output on-screen
may cause those values to become visible to others.

Sensitive values are also still saved in state snapshots stored in your
configured backend. Use the access control and audit mechanisms offered by
the remote system to control who can access that data.