2014-07-16 23:51:48 +02:00
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
layout: "intro"
|
|
|
|
|
page_title: "Terraform vs. Chef, Puppet, etc."
|
|
|
|
|
sidebar_current: "vs-other-chef"
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Terraform vs. Chef, Puppet, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-09-02 20:29:22 +02:00
|
|
|
Configuration management tools install and manage software on a machine
|
|
|
|
|
that already exists. Terraform is not a configuration management tool,
|
|
|
|
|
and it allows existing tooling to focus on their strengths: bootstrapping
|
|
|
|
|
and initializing resources.
|
2014-07-16 23:51:48 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-09-02 20:29:22 +02:00
|
|
|
Using provisioners, Terraform enables any configuration management tool
|
2014-07-25 18:53:06 +02:00
|
|
|
to be used to setup a resource once it has been created. Terraform
|
|
|
|
|
focuses on the higher-level abstraction of the datacenter and associated
|
|
|
|
|
services, without sacrificing the ability to use configuration management
|
|
|
|
|
tools to do what they do best. It also embraces the same codification that
|
|
|
|
|
is responsible for the success of those tools, making entire infrastructure
|
2014-07-27 21:30:25 +02:00
|
|
|
deployments easy and reliable.
|
2014-07-16 23:51:48 +02:00
|
|
|
|
