2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
package repl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import (
|
2018-10-03 02:02:48 +02:00
|
|
|
"flag"
|
|
|
|
"os"
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
"strings"
|
|
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-03 02:21:50 +02:00
|
|
|
"github.com/zclconf/go-cty/cty"
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/addrs"
|
2018-10-03 02:21:50 +02:00
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/configs/configschema"
|
command: "terraform init" can partially initialize for 0.12upgrade
There are a few constructs from 0.11 and prior that cause 0.12 parsing to
fail altogether, which previously created a chicken/egg problem because
we need to install the providers in order to run "terraform 0.12upgrade"
and thus fix the problem.
This changes "terraform init" to use the new "early configuration" loader
for module and provider installation. This is built on the more permissive
parser in the terraform-config-inspect package, and so it allows us to
read out the top-level blocks from the configuration while accepting
legacy HCL syntax.
In the long run this will let us do version compatibility detection before
attempting a "real" config load, giving us better error messages for any
future syntax additions, but in the short term the key thing is that it
allows us to install the dependencies even if the configuration isn't
fully valid.
Because backend init still requires full configuration, this introduces a
new mode of terraform init where it detects heuristically if it seems like
we need to do a configuration upgrade and does a partial init if so,
before finally directing the user to run "terraform 0.12upgrade" before
running any other commands.
The heuristic here is based on two assumptions:
- If the "early" loader finds no errors but the normal loader does, the
configuration is likely to be valid for Terraform 0.11 but not 0.12.
- If there's already a version constraint in the configuration that
excludes Terraform versions prior to v0.12 then the configuration is
probably _already_ upgraded and so it's just a normal syntax error,
even if the early loader didn't detect it.
Once the upgrade process is removed in 0.13.0 (users will be required to
go stepwise 0.11 -> 0.12 -> 0.13 to upgrade after that), some of this can
be simplified to remove that special mode, but the idea of doing the
dependency version checks against the liberal parser will remain valuable
to increase our chances of reporting version-based incompatibilities
rather than syntax errors as we add new features in future.
2019-01-14 20:11:00 +01:00
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/internal/initwd"
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/providers"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/states"
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/terraform"
|
2020-10-18 16:01:48 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ "github.com/hashicorp/terraform/internal/logging"
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-03 02:02:48 +02:00
|
|
|
func TestMain(m *testing.M) {
|
|
|
|
flag.Parse()
|
|
|
|
os.Exit(m.Run())
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
func TestSession_basicState(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-10-03 02:02:48 +02:00
|
|
|
state := states.BuildState(func(s *states.SyncState) {
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
s.SetResourceInstanceCurrent(
|
|
|
|
addrs.Resource{
|
|
|
|
Mode: addrs.ManagedResourceMode,
|
|
|
|
Type: "test_instance",
|
|
|
|
Name: "foo",
|
|
|
|
}.Instance(addrs.NoKey).Absolute(addrs.RootModuleInstance),
|
|
|
|
&states.ResourceInstanceObjectSrc{
|
2018-10-03 02:02:48 +02:00
|
|
|
Status: states.ObjectReady,
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
AttrsJSON: []byte(`{"id":"bar"}`),
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
},
|
2020-02-13 21:32:58 +01:00
|
|
|
addrs.AbsProviderConfig{
|
2020-04-03 20:20:24 +02:00
|
|
|
Provider: addrs.NewDefaultProvider("test"),
|
2020-03-11 19:19:52 +01:00
|
|
|
Module: addrs.RootModule,
|
2020-02-13 21:32:58 +01:00
|
|
|
},
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
s.SetResourceInstanceCurrent(
|
|
|
|
addrs.Resource{
|
|
|
|
Mode: addrs.ManagedResourceMode,
|
|
|
|
Type: "test_instance",
|
|
|
|
Name: "foo",
|
|
|
|
}.Instance(addrs.NoKey).Absolute(addrs.RootModuleInstance.Child("module", addrs.NoKey)),
|
|
|
|
&states.ResourceInstanceObjectSrc{
|
2018-10-03 02:02:48 +02:00
|
|
|
Status: states.ObjectReady,
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
AttrsJSON: []byte(`{"id":"bar"}`),
|
2016-11-14 07:17:51 +01:00
|
|
|
},
|
2020-02-13 21:32:58 +01:00
|
|
|
addrs.AbsProviderConfig{
|
2020-04-03 20:20:24 +02:00
|
|
|
Provider: addrs.NewDefaultProvider("test"),
|
2020-03-11 19:19:52 +01:00
|
|
|
Module: addrs.RootModule,
|
2020-02-13 21:32:58 +01:00
|
|
|
},
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
})
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("basic", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
testSession(t, testSessionTest{
|
|
|
|
State: state,
|
|
|
|
Inputs: []testSessionInput{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Input: "test_instance.foo.id",
|
2020-09-09 20:13:53 +02:00
|
|
|
Output: `"bar"`,
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("missing resource", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
testSession(t, testSessionTest{
|
|
|
|
State: state,
|
|
|
|
Inputs: []testSessionInput{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Input: "test_instance.bar.id",
|
|
|
|
Error: true,
|
2018-11-21 02:25:05 +01:00
|
|
|
ErrorContains: `A managed resource "test_instance" "bar" has not been declared`,
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
2016-11-14 07:17:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("missing module", func(t *testing.T) {
|
2018-11-28 20:25:44 +01:00
|
|
|
testSession(t, testSessionTest{
|
|
|
|
State: state,
|
|
|
|
Inputs: []testSessionInput{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Input: "module.child",
|
|
|
|
Error: true,
|
|
|
|
ErrorContains: `No module call named "child" is declared in the root module.`,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("missing module referencing just one output", func(t *testing.T) {
|
2016-11-14 07:17:51 +01:00
|
|
|
testSession(t, testSessionTest{
|
|
|
|
State: state,
|
|
|
|
Inputs: []testSessionInput{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Input: "module.child.foo",
|
|
|
|
Error: true,
|
2018-11-28 20:25:44 +01:00
|
|
|
ErrorContains: `No module call named "child" is declared in the root module.`,
|
2016-11-14 07:17:51 +01:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("missing module output", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
testSession(t, testSessionTest{
|
|
|
|
State: state,
|
|
|
|
Inputs: []testSessionInput{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Input: "module.module.foo",
|
|
|
|
Error: true,
|
2020-04-14 20:50:43 +02:00
|
|
|
ErrorContains: `Unsupported attribute: This object does not have an attribute named "foo"`,
|
2016-11-14 07:17:51 +01:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestSession_stateless(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Run("exit", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
testSession(t, testSessionTest{
|
|
|
|
Inputs: []testSessionInput{
|
|
|
|
{
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
Input: "exit",
|
|
|
|
Exit: true,
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("help", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
testSession(t, testSessionTest{
|
|
|
|
Inputs: []testSessionInput{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Input: "help",
|
|
|
|
OutputContains: "allows you to",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("help with spaces", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
testSession(t, testSessionTest{
|
|
|
|
Inputs: []testSessionInput{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Input: "help ",
|
|
|
|
OutputContains: "allows you to",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("basic math", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
testSession(t, testSessionTest{
|
|
|
|
Inputs: []testSessionInput{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Input: "1 + 5",
|
|
|
|
Output: "6",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Run("missing resource", func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
testSession(t, testSessionTest{
|
|
|
|
Inputs: []testSessionInput{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Input: "test_instance.bar.id",
|
|
|
|
Error: true,
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
ErrorContains: `resource "test_instance" "bar" has not been declared`,
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func testSession(t *testing.T, test testSessionTest) {
|
2018-11-21 02:25:05 +01:00
|
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
p := &terraform.MockProvider{}
|
2021-01-12 22:13:10 +01:00
|
|
|
p.GetSchemaResponse = &providers.GetSchemaResponse{
|
|
|
|
ResourceTypes: map[string]providers.Schema{
|
2018-10-03 02:21:50 +02:00
|
|
|
"test_instance": {
|
2021-01-12 22:13:10 +01:00
|
|
|
Block: &configschema.Block{
|
|
|
|
Attributes: map[string]*configschema.Attribute{
|
|
|
|
"id": {Type: cty.String, Computed: true},
|
|
|
|
},
|
2018-10-03 02:21:50 +02:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-09 03:39:14 +01:00
|
|
|
config, _, cleanup, configDiags := initwd.LoadConfigForTests(t, "testdata/config-fixture")
|
2018-10-03 02:21:50 +02:00
|
|
|
defer cleanup()
|
|
|
|
if configDiags.HasErrors() {
|
2019-01-09 03:39:14 +01:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected problems loading config: %s", configDiags.Err())
|
2018-10-03 02:21:50 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
// Build the TF context
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
ctx, diags := terraform.NewContext(&terraform.ContextOpts{
|
2018-10-03 02:02:48 +02:00
|
|
|
State: test.State,
|
2020-04-03 20:20:24 +02:00
|
|
|
Providers: map[addrs.Provider]providers.Factory{
|
|
|
|
addrs.NewDefaultProvider("test"): providers.FactoryFixed(p),
|
|
|
|
},
|
2018-10-03 02:21:50 +02:00
|
|
|
Config: config,
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
})
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
if diags.HasErrors() {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to create context: %s", diags.Err())
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
scope, diags := ctx.Eval(addrs.RootModuleInstance)
|
|
|
|
if diags.HasErrors() {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to create scope: %s", diags.Err())
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Build the session
|
|
|
|
s := &Session{
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
Scope: scope,
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Test the inputs. We purposely don't use subtests here because
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
// the inputs don't represent subtests, but a sequence of stateful
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
// operations.
|
|
|
|
for _, input := range test.Inputs {
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
result, exit, diags := s.Handle(input.Input)
|
|
|
|
if exit != input.Exit {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("incorrect 'exit' result %t; want %t", exit, input.Exit)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (diags.HasErrors()) != input.Error {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("%q: unexpected errors: %s", input.Input, diags.Err())
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
if diags.HasErrors() {
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
if input.ErrorContains != "" {
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
if !strings.Contains(diags.Err().Error(), input.ErrorContains) {
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf(
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
"%q: diagnostics should contain: %q\n\n%s",
|
|
|
|
input.Input, input.ErrorContains, diags.Err(),
|
|
|
|
)
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if input.Output != "" && result != input.Output {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf(
|
|
|
|
"%q: expected:\n\n%s\n\ngot:\n\n%s",
|
|
|
|
input.Input, input.Output, result)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if input.OutputContains != "" && !strings.Contains(result, input.OutputContains) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf(
|
|
|
|
"%q: expected contains:\n\n%s\n\ngot:\n\n%s",
|
|
|
|
input.Input, input.OutputContains, result)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type testSessionTest struct {
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
State *states.State // State to use
|
2019-06-30 09:38:36 +02:00
|
|
|
Module string // Module name in testdata to load
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Inputs are the list of test inputs that are run in order.
|
|
|
|
// Each input can test the output of each step.
|
|
|
|
Inputs []testSessionInput
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// testSessionInput is a single input to test for a session.
|
|
|
|
type testSessionInput struct {
|
|
|
|
Input string // Input string
|
|
|
|
Output string // Exact output string to check
|
|
|
|
OutputContains string
|
|
|
|
Error bool // Error is true if error is expected
|
2018-09-29 02:15:35 +02:00
|
|
|
Exit bool // Exit is true if exiting is expected
|
2016-11-14 07:04:21 +01:00
|
|
|
ErrorContains string
|
|
|
|
}
|