ResiLien
/
terraform
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
terraform/internal/earlyconfig/config_test.go

85 lines
2.6 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

internal/getproviders: A new shared model for provider requirements We've been using the models from the "moduledeps" package to represent our provider dependencies everywhere since the idea of provider dependencies was introduced in Terraform 0.10, but that model is not convenient to use for any use-case other than the "terraform providers" command that needs individual-module-level detail. To make things easier for new codepaths working with the new-style provider installer, here we introduce a new model type getproviders.Requirements which is based on the type the new installer was already taking as its input. We have new methods in the states, configs, and earlyconfig packages to produce values of this type, and a helper to merge Requirements together so we can combine config-derived and state-derived requirements together during installation. The advantage of this new model over the moduledeps one is that all of recursive module walking is done up front and we produce a simple, flat structure that is more convenient for the main use-cases of selecting providers for installation and then finding providers in the local cache to use them for other operations. This new model is _not_ suitable for implementing "terraform providers" because it does not retain module-specific requirement details. Therefore we will likely keep using moduledeps for "terraform providers" for now, and then possibly at a later time consider specializing the moduledeps logic for only what "terraform providers" needs, because it seems to be the only use-case that needs to retain that level of detail.
2020-03-26 20:04:48 +01:00
package earlyconfig
import (
"log"
"path/filepath"
"testing"
"github.com/google/go-cmp/cmp"
version "github.com/hashicorp/go-version"
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform-config-inspect/tfconfig"
svchost "github.com/hashicorp/terraform-svchost"
Move addrs/ to internal/addrs/ This is part of a general effort to move all of Terraform's non-library package surface under internal in order to reinforce that these are for internal use within Terraform only. If you were previously importing packages under this prefix into an external codebase, you could pin to an earlier release tag as an interim solution until you've make a plan to achieve the same functionality some other way.
2021-05-17 21:00:50 +02:00
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/internal/addrs"
internal/getproviders: A new shared model for provider requirements We've been using the models from the "moduledeps" package to represent our provider dependencies everywhere since the idea of provider dependencies was introduced in Terraform 0.10, but that model is not convenient to use for any use-case other than the "terraform providers" command that needs individual-module-level detail. To make things easier for new codepaths working with the new-style provider installer, here we introduce a new model type getproviders.Requirements which is based on the type the new installer was already taking as its input. We have new methods in the states, configs, and earlyconfig packages to produce values of this type, and a helper to merge Requirements together so we can combine config-derived and state-derived requirements together during installation. The advantage of this new model over the moduledeps one is that all of recursive module walking is done up front and we produce a simple, flat structure that is more convenient for the main use-cases of selecting providers for installation and then finding providers in the local cache to use them for other operations. This new model is _not_ suitable for implementing "terraform providers" because it does not retain module-specific requirement details. Therefore we will likely keep using moduledeps for "terraform providers" for now, and then possibly at a later time consider specializing the moduledeps logic for only what "terraform providers" needs, because it seems to be the only use-case that needs to retain that level of detail.
2020-03-26 20:04:48 +01:00
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/internal/getproviders"
Move tfdiags/ to internal/tfdiags/ This is part of a general effort to move all of Terraform's non-library package surface under internal in order to reinforce that these are for internal use within Terraform only. If you were previously importing packages under this prefix into an external codebase, you could pin to an earlier release tag as an interim solution until you've make a plan to achieve the same functionality some other way.
2021-05-17 19:11:06 +02:00
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform/internal/tfdiags"
internal/getproviders: A new shared model for provider requirements We've been using the models from the "moduledeps" package to represent our provider dependencies everywhere since the idea of provider dependencies was introduced in Terraform 0.10, but that model is not convenient to use for any use-case other than the "terraform providers" command that needs individual-module-level detail. To make things easier for new codepaths working with the new-style provider installer, here we introduce a new model type getproviders.Requirements which is based on the type the new installer was already taking as its input. We have new methods in the states, configs, and earlyconfig packages to produce values of this type, and a helper to merge Requirements together so we can combine config-derived and state-derived requirements together during installation. The advantage of this new model over the moduledeps one is that all of recursive module walking is done up front and we produce a simple, flat structure that is more convenient for the main use-cases of selecting providers for installation and then finding providers in the local cache to use them for other operations. This new model is _not_ suitable for implementing "terraform providers" because it does not retain module-specific requirement details. Therefore we will likely keep using moduledeps for "terraform providers" for now, and then possibly at a later time consider specializing the moduledeps logic for only what "terraform providers" needs, because it seems to be the only use-case that needs to retain that level of detail.
2020-03-26 20:04:48 +01:00
)
func TestConfigProviderRequirements(t *testing.T) {
cfg := testConfig(t, "testdata/provider-reqs")
impliedProvider := addrs.NewProvider(
addrs: Rename DefaultRegistryHost to DefaultProviderRegistryHost As the comment notes, this hostname is the default for provide source addresses. We'll shortly be adding some address types to represent module source addresses too, and so we'll also have DefaultModuleRegistryHost for that situation. (They'll actually both contain the the same hostname, but that's a coincidence rather than a requirement.)
2021-05-27 20:09:28 +02:00
addrs.DefaultProviderRegistryHost,
internal/getproviders: A new shared model for provider requirements We've been using the models from the "moduledeps" package to represent our provider dependencies everywhere since the idea of provider dependencies was introduced in Terraform 0.10, but that model is not convenient to use for any use-case other than the "terraform providers" command that needs individual-module-level detail. To make things easier for new codepaths working with the new-style provider installer, here we introduce a new model type getproviders.Requirements which is based on the type the new installer was already taking as its input. We have new methods in the states, configs, and earlyconfig packages to produce values of this type, and a helper to merge Requirements together so we can combine config-derived and state-derived requirements together during installation. The advantage of this new model over the moduledeps one is that all of recursive module walking is done up front and we produce a simple, flat structure that is more convenient for the main use-cases of selecting providers for installation and then finding providers in the local cache to use them for other operations. This new model is _not_ suitable for implementing "terraform providers" because it does not retain module-specific requirement details. Therefore we will likely keep using moduledeps for "terraform providers" for now, and then possibly at a later time consider specializing the moduledeps logic for only what "terraform providers" needs, because it seems to be the only use-case that needs to retain that level of detail.
2020-03-26 20:04:48 +01:00
"hashicorp", "implied",
)
nullProvider := addrs.NewProvider(
addrs: Rename DefaultRegistryHost to DefaultProviderRegistryHost As the comment notes, this hostname is the default for provide source addresses. We'll shortly be adding some address types to represent module source addresses too, and so we'll also have DefaultModuleRegistryHost for that situation. (They'll actually both contain the the same hostname, but that's a coincidence rather than a requirement.)
2021-05-27 20:09:28 +02:00
addrs.DefaultProviderRegistryHost,
internal/getproviders: A new shared model for provider requirements We've been using the models from the "moduledeps" package to represent our provider dependencies everywhere since the idea of provider dependencies was introduced in Terraform 0.10, but that model is not convenient to use for any use-case other than the "terraform providers" command that needs individual-module-level detail. To make things easier for new codepaths working with the new-style provider installer, here we introduce a new model type getproviders.Requirements which is based on the type the new installer was already taking as its input. We have new methods in the states, configs, and earlyconfig packages to produce values of this type, and a helper to merge Requirements together so we can combine config-derived and state-derived requirements together during installation. The advantage of this new model over the moduledeps one is that all of recursive module walking is done up front and we produce a simple, flat structure that is more convenient for the main use-cases of selecting providers for installation and then finding providers in the local cache to use them for other operations. This new model is _not_ suitable for implementing "terraform providers" because it does not retain module-specific requirement details. Therefore we will likely keep using moduledeps for "terraform providers" for now, and then possibly at a later time consider specializing the moduledeps logic for only what "terraform providers" needs, because it seems to be the only use-case that needs to retain that level of detail.
2020-03-26 20:04:48 +01:00
"hashicorp", "null",
)
randomProvider := addrs.NewProvider(
addrs: Rename DefaultRegistryHost to DefaultProviderRegistryHost As the comment notes, this hostname is the default for provide source addresses. We'll shortly be adding some address types to represent module source addresses too, and so we'll also have DefaultModuleRegistryHost for that situation. (They'll actually both contain the the same hostname, but that's a coincidence rather than a requirement.)
2021-05-27 20:09:28 +02:00
addrs.DefaultProviderRegistryHost,
internal/getproviders: A new shared model for provider requirements We've been using the models from the "moduledeps" package to represent our provider dependencies everywhere since the idea of provider dependencies was introduced in Terraform 0.10, but that model is not convenient to use for any use-case other than the "terraform providers" command that needs individual-module-level detail. To make things easier for new codepaths working with the new-style provider installer, here we introduce a new model type getproviders.Requirements which is based on the type the new installer was already taking as its input. We have new methods in the states, configs, and earlyconfig packages to produce values of this type, and a helper to merge Requirements together so we can combine config-derived and state-derived requirements together during installation. The advantage of this new model over the moduledeps one is that all of recursive module walking is done up front and we produce a simple, flat structure that is more convenient for the main use-cases of selecting providers for installation and then finding providers in the local cache to use them for other operations. This new model is _not_ suitable for implementing "terraform providers" because it does not retain module-specific requirement details. Therefore we will likely keep using moduledeps for "terraform providers" for now, and then possibly at a later time consider specializing the moduledeps logic for only what "terraform providers" needs, because it seems to be the only use-case that needs to retain that level of detail.
2020-03-26 20:04:48 +01:00
"hashicorp", "random",
)
tlsProvider := addrs.NewProvider(
addrs: Rename DefaultRegistryHost to DefaultProviderRegistryHost As the comment notes, this hostname is the default for provide source addresses. We'll shortly be adding some address types to represent module source addresses too, and so we'll also have DefaultModuleRegistryHost for that situation. (They'll actually both contain the the same hostname, but that's a coincidence rather than a requirement.)
2021-05-27 20:09:28 +02:00
addrs.DefaultProviderRegistryHost,
internal/getproviders: A new shared model for provider requirements We've been using the models from the "moduledeps" package to represent our provider dependencies everywhere since the idea of provider dependencies was introduced in Terraform 0.10, but that model is not convenient to use for any use-case other than the "terraform providers" command that needs individual-module-level detail. To make things easier for new codepaths working with the new-style provider installer, here we introduce a new model type getproviders.Requirements which is based on the type the new installer was already taking as its input. We have new methods in the states, configs, and earlyconfig packages to produce values of this type, and a helper to merge Requirements together so we can combine config-derived and state-derived requirements together during installation. The advantage of this new model over the moduledeps one is that all of recursive module walking is done up front and we produce a simple, flat structure that is more convenient for the main use-cases of selecting providers for installation and then finding providers in the local cache to use them for other operations. This new model is _not_ suitable for implementing "terraform providers" because it does not retain module-specific requirement details. Therefore we will likely keep using moduledeps for "terraform providers" for now, and then possibly at a later time consider specializing the moduledeps logic for only what "terraform providers" needs, because it seems to be the only use-case that needs to retain that level of detail.
2020-03-26 20:04:48 +01:00
"hashicorp", "tls",
)
happycloudProvider := addrs.NewProvider(
svchost.Hostname("tf.example.com"),
"awesomecorp", "happycloud",
)
got, diags := cfg.ProviderRequirements()
if diags.HasErrors() {
t.Fatalf("unexpected diagnostics: %s", diags.Err().Error())
}
want := getproviders.Requirements{
// the nullProvider constraints from the two modules are merged
nullProvider: getproviders.MustParseVersionConstraints("~> 2.0.0, 2.0.1"),
randomProvider: getproviders.MustParseVersionConstraints("~> 1.2.0"),
tlsProvider: getproviders.MustParseVersionConstraints("~> 3.0"),
impliedProvider: nil,
happycloudProvider: nil,
}
if diff := cmp.Diff(want, got); diff != "" {
t.Errorf("wrong result\n%s", diff)
}
}
func testConfig(t *testing.T, baseDir string) *Config {
rootMod, diags := LoadModule(baseDir)
if diags.HasErrors() {
t.Fatalf("unexpected diagnostics: %s", diags.Err().Error())
}
cfg, diags := BuildConfig(rootMod, ModuleWalkerFunc(testModuleWalkerFunc))
if diags.HasErrors() {
t.Fatalf("unexpected diagnostics: %s", diags.Err().Error())
}
return cfg
}
// testModuleWalkerFunc is a simple implementation of ModuleWalkerFunc that
// only understands how to resolve relative filesystem paths, using source
// location information from the call.
func testModuleWalkerFunc(req *ModuleRequest) (*tfconfig.Module, *version.Version, tfdiags.Diagnostics) {
callFilename := req.CallPos.Filename
Refactoring of module source addresses and module installation It's been a long while since we gave close attention to the codepaths for module source address parsing and external module package installation. Due to their age, these codepaths often diverged from our modern practices such as representing address types in the addrs package, and encapsulating package installation details only in a particular location. In particular, this refactor makes source address parsing a separate step from module installation, which therefore makes the result of that parsing available to other Terraform subsystems which work with the configuration representation objects. This also presented the opportunity to better encapsulate our use of go-getter into a new package "getmodules" (echoing "getproviders"), which is intended to be the only part of Terraform that directly interacts with go-getter. This is largely just a refactor of the existing functionality into a new code organization, but there is one notable change in behavior here: the source address parsing now happens during configuration loading rather than module installation, which may cause errors about invalid addresses to be returned in different situations than before. That counts as backward compatible because we only promise to remain compatible with configurations that are _valid_, which means that they can be initialized, planned, and applied without any errors. This doesn't introduce any new error cases, and instead just makes a pre-existing error case be detected earlier. Our module registry client is still using its own special module address type from registry/regsrc for now, with a small shim from the new addrs.ModuleSourceRegistry type. Hopefully in a later commit we'll also rework the registry client to work with the new address type, but this commit is already big enough as it is.
2021-05-28 04:24:59 +02:00
sourcePath := req.SourceAddr.String()
internal/getproviders: A new shared model for provider requirements We've been using the models from the "moduledeps" package to represent our provider dependencies everywhere since the idea of provider dependencies was introduced in Terraform 0.10, but that model is not convenient to use for any use-case other than the "terraform providers" command that needs individual-module-level detail. To make things easier for new codepaths working with the new-style provider installer, here we introduce a new model type getproviders.Requirements which is based on the type the new installer was already taking as its input. We have new methods in the states, configs, and earlyconfig packages to produce values of this type, and a helper to merge Requirements together so we can combine config-derived and state-derived requirements together during installation. The advantage of this new model over the moduledeps one is that all of recursive module walking is done up front and we produce a simple, flat structure that is more convenient for the main use-cases of selecting providers for installation and then finding providers in the local cache to use them for other operations. This new model is _not_ suitable for implementing "terraform providers" because it does not retain module-specific requirement details. Therefore we will likely keep using moduledeps for "terraform providers" for now, and then possibly at a later time consider specializing the moduledeps logic for only what "terraform providers" needs, because it seems to be the only use-case that needs to retain that level of detail.
2020-03-26 20:04:48 +01:00
finalPath := filepath.Join(filepath.Dir(callFilename), sourcePath)
log.Printf("[TRACE] %s in %s -> %s", sourcePath, callFilename, finalPath)
newMod, diags := LoadModule(finalPath)
return newMod, version.Must(version.NewVersion("0.0.0")), diags
}